41
Shared decision making and physical therapy: What, when, how, and why?Tammy Hoffmann, Mina Bakhit, Zoe Michaleff
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26:100382
41
Highlights
- -
Shared decision making helps to translate evidence into practice.
- -
It can improve communication and accuracy of intervention expectations.
- -
Physical therapists are ideally positioned to practice shared decision making.
- -
Shared decision making is a skill that should be taught to clinicians.
- -
Strategies to increase its uptake are required at multiple levels.
31
Physical therapists and public perceptions of telerehabilitation: An online open survey on acceptability, preferences, and needsLívia G. Fernandes, Rafael F.F. Oliveira, Pamela M. Barros, Felipe R.C. Fagundes, Renato J. Soares, Bruno T. Saragiotto
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26:100464
31
Highlights
- •
Physical therapists and the general population are hesitant in using telerehabilitation. Concerns include, but are not limited to, the financial worth of telerehabilitation.
- •
Physical therapists agree with the provision of education and self-management strategies via telerehabilitation, but the general population highlights the need for exercise prescription and technical orientation on exercise performance.
- •
Practical recommendations and adequate training are needed to address physical therapists’ acceptability to telerehabilitation. For the general population, gradual exposure to telerehabilitation could enhance engagement with this mode of delivering physical therapy.
29
Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research studyTiziano Innocenti, Daniel Feller, Silvia Giagio, Stefano Salvioli, Silvia Minnucci, Fabrizio Brindisino, Carola Cosentino, Leonardo Piano, ... Raymond Ostelo
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26:100450
29
Highlights
- •
The mean overall adherence to the PRISMA checklist across the sample of systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals was 61.4%.
- •
A high overall risk of bias was a significant predictor of lower adherence (B=−7.1%; 95%CI −12.1, −2.0).
- •
Studies published in fourth quartile journals displayed a lower overall adherence than those published in the first quartile.
- •
No association between adherence and publication options and publication year was found.
- •
The overall adherence increased (B= 11.9%; 95%CI 5.9, 18.0) when the SR protocol was registered
22
Which psychosocial factors are related to severe pain and functional limitation in patients with low back pain?Leticia Amaral Corrêa, Stephanie Mathieson, Ney Armando de Mello Meziat-Filho, Felipe José Reis, Arthur de Sá Ferreira, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26:100413
22
HIGHLIGHTS
- •
Cognitive factors are related to unfavourable clinical outcomes in patients with LBP.
- •
Kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and maladaptive beliefs played a negative role in LBP.
- •
Anxiety, symptoms of depression, and perceived stress were not linked to severe pain.
18
Maximising individualisation of sports injury risk reduction approach to reach successPascal Edouard, Benjamin Caumeil, Evert Verhagen, Gaël Guilhem, Alexis Ruffault
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26:100394
18
Highlights
- •
To individualise injury risk reduction measures could help to better match athlete's individual characteristics and should thus improve their effectiveness.
- •
To individualise injury risk reduction measures could help to improve athlete adherence into such measures and consequently their effectiveness.
- •
This maximised individualised approach is proposed to be used whatever the sport (i.e., individual and teams sports) in both scientific studies and real-world settings, with an end-user centred approach (especially athlete-centred approach) and a co-construction of the injury risk reduction measures with all stakeholders.
17
Patients should not rely on low back pain information from Brazilian official websites: A mixed-methods reviewRaiany Pires Santos, Thamires Prazeres Alonso, Igor Macedo Tavares Correia, Leandro Calazans Nogueira, Ney Meziat-Filho, Felipe J.J. Reis
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26:100389
17
Highlights
- •
Patients should not rely on low back pain information from Brazilian official websites.
- •
The Brazilian official websites do not follow the recommendations from clinical practice guidelines.
- •
Brazilian official websites show low credibility standards and inaccurate information about low back pain.
12
Trajectories of pain and disability in older adults with acute low back pain: Longitudinal data of the BACE-Brazil cohortJuscelio Pereira da Silva, Fabianna Resende de Jesus-Moraleida, Diogo Carvalho Felício, André Gustavo Pereira de Andrade, Daniele Sirineu Pereira, Manuela Loureiro Ferreira, Leani Souza Máximo Pereira
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022;26:100386
12
Highlights
- •
The general course of acute low back pain does not reflect the aging heterogeneity.
- •
Older adults with acute low back pain have varied pain and disability trajectories.
- •
Complete recovery trajectories and persistent severe trajectories were identified.
- •
Worse biopsychosocial health was associated with persistent severe trajectories.
- •
Specific clinical care for different courses of low back pain can be implemented.