Journal Information

Most cited

21
Artificial intelligence and Machine Learning approaches in sports: Concepts, applications, challenges, and future perspectives
Felipe J.J. Reis, Rafael Krasic Alaiti, Caio Sain Vallio, Luiz Hespanhol
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024;28:101083
21
Highlights

  • AI can benefit injury prevention and performance optimization in sports.

  • Challenges include data availability, ethical, social and technical issues.

  • Strategies to AI implementation should be developed and discussed.

Full text access
12
Measurement properties of upper extremity physical performance tests in athletes: a systematic review
Germanna Medeiros Barbosa, Letícia Bojikian Calixtre, Hilmaynne Renaly Fonseca Fialho, Francisco Locks, Danilo Harudy Kamonseki
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024;28:100575
12
Highlights

  • The closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST) and the seated Single-Arm/ unilateral seated shot-put test showed adequate reliability.

  • The seated medicine ball throw is valid to evaluate upper body power.

  • Other upper extremity physical performance tests should be used with caution due to low quality of evidence or suboptimal measurement properties.

Full text access
5
The SPORTS Participation Framework: illuminating the pathway for people with disability to enter into, participate in, and excel at sport
Georgina Leigh Clutterbuck, Ricardo Rodrigues de Sousa Junior, Hércules Ribeiro Leite, Leanne Marie Johnston
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024;28:101081
5
Highlights

The SPORTS Participation Framework can be used across health, sport, and education sectors to:

  • Enhance interdisciplinary communication for children with disability with sports-focused goals.

  • Identify and describe children's current stage of sports participation.

  • Plan time- and cost-effective management strategies to reach goal stage of sports participation.

Full text access
Open Article
4
Comparing physical therapy students' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic low back pain and knee osteoarthritis: an international multi-institutional comparison between 2013 and 2020 academic years
Wouter Munneke, Christophe Demoulin, Nathalie Roussel, Marijke Leysen, C. Paul Van Wilgen, Laurent Pitance, Roland R. Reezigt, Lennard P. Voogt, ... Jo Nijs
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024;28:100592
4
Highlights

  • In 2020, students’ beliefs regarding chronic pain were more biopsychosocial.

  • In 2020, students’ guideline adherence was higher except for work, it remained low.

  • 4th year students have stronger biopsychosocial beliefs than 2nd year students.

  • Students’ beliefs regarding chronic pain differed significantly between institutions.

  • Actions are needed to improve students’ attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic pain.

Full text access
4
Physical therapy interventions used to treat individuals with biceps tendinopathy: a scoping review
Amy W. McDevitt, Jodi L. Young, Joshua A. Cleland, Paisley Hiefield, Suzanne J. Snodgrass
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024;28:100586
4
Highlights

  • Varied interventions were reported for LHBT tendinopathy.

  • Modalities dominate studies while literature reviews stress multimodal care.

  • Evidence gaps persist in the conservative management of LHBT tendinopathy.

Full text access
4
Prevalence of disabling musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents in Brazil: A cross-sectional study
Bruna Alves Hatakeyama, Bárbara Isabel Aparecida Camargo, Verônica Souza Santos, Mariana Nascimento Leite, Caique de Melo do Espirito Santo, Steven J. Kamper, Chris G. Maher, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Tiê P. Yamato
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024;28:100593
4
Highlights

  • Almost three in every 10 children and adolescent had disabling musculoskeletal pain.

  • Children and adolescents felt disabling musculoskeletal pain most on back and legs.

  • Parents tend to underestimate the presence of pain in their children.

Full text access
3
Reporting of confidence intervals, achievement of intended sample size, and adjustment for multiple primary outcomes in randomised trials of physical therapy interventions: an analysis of 100 representatively sampled trials
David Fernández Hernando, Mark Elkins, Ana Paula Coelho Figueira Freire
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024;28:101079
3
Highlights

  • Less than half of randomised trials of physical therapy reported confidence intervals.

  • There was an increase of 5 % in the reporting of confidence intervals since 2016.

  • Most trials that report confidence intervals do not interpret them.

  • One-third of physical therapy trials did not report a sample size calculation.

  • There is still a need to increase the use of adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Full text access
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.