- •
Explaining pain to patients who survived cancer should be individually tailored.
- •
Take the patient's pain beliefs, cognitions, pain memories, social factors and dominant pain mechanism into account.
- •
Explaining pain implies teaching patients about the underlying biopsychosocial mechanisms of pain.
- •
Pain neuroscience education is a potential solution to improve pain outcome in cancer survivors, but should never be a stand-alone treatment.
- •
Pain neuroscience education should precede interventions such as graded activity, exercise therapy, stress management, sleep management and dietary advice.
- •
NMES might be used as adjuvant therapy to improve sitting and standing GMFM dimensions.
- •
NMES is not better than PT alone to improve GMFM walking dimension.
- •
Further research is still necessary to determine the precise effects of NMES on GMFM.
- •
C1/C2 hypomobility is an important finding in women with migraine and is related to migraine chronicity.
- •
Mobility of the C1/C2 segment is influenced by neck pain related-disability.
- •
Chronic migraine patients have a reduced global cervical range of motion.
- •
Physical therapists from dermatology report having knowledge to be able to implement EBP.
- •
Physical therapists from dermatology believe having skills to be able to implement EBP.
- •
There were inconsistencies on some answers about knowledge and skills related to EBP.
- •
Associations between type and severity of hip pathology with pre-operative patient reported outcome measures were investigated.
- •
High prevalence of labral pathology and acetabular chondropathy were observed.
- •
Severe femoral head chondropathy and large labral tears are often undetected with imaging.
- •
Severe chondropathies are most associated with PROs; however only explain 22% of the variability.
- •
Impairment and activity measures were significantly correlated with ability of locomotion.
- •
Walking speed explained 35% of the variance in the ABILOCO scores.
- •
Locomotion ability may increase if attention is focused on increasing walking speed.
- •
Physical therapists routinely examine strength, range of motion and muscle flexibility of the hip(s) for individuals with low back pain.
- •
Physical therapists often provide strengthening and flexibility interventions targeting the hips for individuals with low back pain.
- •
Post-professional fellowship training as a physical therapist changed intervention selection to include more joint manual therapy and less muscle flexibility and modality usage.
- •
PNF training statistically improves pain intensity, disability and static balance of working-age CLBP people.
- •
Magnitudes of difference of outcomes between PNF training and general trunk exercises did not reach clinical important changes.
- •
The therapist should take into account to use these interventions in rehabilitation programme for CLBP patients.
- •
Nonspecific neck pain patients can be classified based on pain mechanisms.
- •
The proposed classification strategy has clinically acceptable interrater reliability.
- •
The classification holds the potential to guide physical therapy interventions.
- •
Validity testing is the necessary next step to justify this approach for clinical use.
- •
Low back pain trials are published in a variety of healthcare journals.
- •
The methodological quality of low back pain trials is moderate.
- •
55.5% of low back pain trials endorsed the CONSORT statement recommendations.
- •
Reporting guidelines should be strictly followed.