Compartilhar
Informação da revista
Vol. 28. Núm. S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 Abril 2024)
Compartilhar
Compartilhar
Baixar PDF
Mais opções do artigo
Vol. 28. Núm. S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 Abril 2024)
235
Acesso de texto completo
CAN THE BEDDING BRIDGE TEST IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS PREDICT OUTCOMES AFTER 6 MONTHS OF FOLLOW-UP?
Visitas
161
Nara Batista de Souza1, Larissa Guimarães Paiva1, Thiago Martins Fernandes Paticcie1, Anderson José1, Cristino Carneiro de Oliveira1, Carla Malaguti1
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Este item recebeu
Informação do artigo
Suplemento especial
Este artigo faz parte de:
Vol. 28. Núm S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

Mais dados
Background

Early detection of functional limitations remains an important goal to prevent disability in individuals who have been hospitalized.

Objectives

To examine the association between versions of the bed bridge test (BBT), a new functional test to assess hospitalized patients, and post-hospitalization outcomes such as return to work, death, readmission and falls in individuals after six months of discharge.

Methods

This is a longitudinal, observational, prospective study, in which 92 hospitalized patients eligible for the study performed in random order o BBT: 5 repetitions (BBT5R) and 10 repetitions (BBT10R), 30 seconds (BBT30sec) and 60 seconds (BBT60sec). Sociodemographic data, diagnosis, comorbidities, and length of stay were recorded. Six months after hospital discharge, telephone contact was made and information was obtained on return to usual/work activities, rehospitalization, falls, functional independence, and the patient's vital status. Bivariate correlation analysis was performed. The independent variables were gender, age, comorbidities, length of stay, and performance on the BBT versions. The dependent variables were usual/work activities, rehospitalization, falls, functional independence, and death. Linear regression models were used to determine whether the BBT versions and sociodemographic variables predict return to usual/work activities, rehospitalization, falls, functional independence, and death.

Results

The participants (50.9±17.2 years old, 60% women) included in the study were composed of 66% with clinical condition and 34% with surgical condition. All versions of the BTT were associated with age and FSS comorbidity (rs=-0.50 to -0.20 and 0.28 to 0.43; p<0.05 for all). Only BBT30s (rs=0.28) and BBT60s (rs=0.37) were directly associated with returning to usual/work activities. There was no association between the BBT versions and the other dependent variables. Patients who resumed their usual/work activities performed better in BBT30s and BBT60s when compared to those who did not resume their activities (BBT30s = 19 ± 6 vs 15 ± 3.5 repetitions, p = 0.007; and BBT60s = 35 ± 11 vs 30 ± 5.4; p=0.015). Lower comorbidity score, female gender, and better performance on the BBT60s were independent predictors of higher return to work, explaining 40% of the variation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a modest association between return to work 6 months after discharge and better performance on the BBT60s during hospitalization, including lower scores for comorbidities and female sex. This relationship should be interpreted with caution and confirmed in future studies. The BBT60s is a simple, quick, and useful way to include hospitalized people in the follow-up.

Implications

This study allows us to present suggestions for future studies. Thus, it is suggested to continue investigating whether the BBT can be used as a predictor of other outcomes.

Keywords:
Hospitalization
Patient outcome assessment
Mobility Limitation
O texto completo está disponível em PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: I thank God and all the collaborators for all the support and help in carrying out this work.

Ethics committee approval: University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora by opinion No. 5,889,099.

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Opções de artigo
Ferramentas
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.