Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
238
Full text access
EFFECTIVENESS OF CUPPING THERAPY ON MUSCLE PAIN IN RECREATIONAL RUNNERS: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Visits
129
Larissa Oliveira Barbieri Coutinho1, Diogo Carvalho Felício1, Bruno Soares Alves1, Diogo Simões Fonseca1
1 Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

It is recommended that physical activity be a routine for people throughout their lives. The WHO recommends that adults get an average of 300 minutes of moderate activity or at least 75 minutes of high intensity activity per week. Among the sports, street running attracts more and more fans. It is an inclusive modality as it enables several people of different ages to practice it on a daily basis. It is associated with easy access, low cost, and low technical level. The incidence of running-related injuries is between 2.5 to 33 injuries per 1000 hours of running, and the variation occurs due to the type of runner, operationalization of the term injury, and duration of follow-up. To reduce the deleterious effects of muscle damage it is important for athletes to utilize recovery strategies to reduce pain, fatigue, prevent future injury, and enable a faster and more efficient return to training. It is believed that ventosaterapy is a recovery technique that performs drainage and increases blood circulation, facilitating the release of toxins that are associated with pain processes. The application time varies between 5 to 10 minutes with a negative pressure of 300 millibars being sufficient to generate changes in musculoskeletal pain. However, there are several modes of application. Therefore, the development of studies is important to prove the effectiveness of the technique.

Objectives

The primary endpoint evaluates the effectiveness of ventosaterapy on quadriceps muscle pain and the secondary endpoints investigate the effectiveness of the technique on muscle fatigue, performance, overall perceived effect after running.

Methods

This is a randomized controlled trial study, with a follow-up period of 72 hours, registered in the REBEC platform. The runners will be distributed in experimental or control group in a randomized manner. The experimental group will receive vacuum therapy in the quadriceps muscle belly after running and the control group will receive non-effective joint mobilization in the hip and knee joints. Both interventions will last 5 minutes. Allocation will be concealed using opaque, sealed, and numbered envelopes. The runner and the assessor will be blinded to the interventions. Intent-to-treat analysis will be used. Sample selection will be by convenience. Runners will be recruited after running street races in the city of Juiz de Fora and will be instructed not to perform vigorous physical activity 24 hours before and 72 hours after data collection. Inclusion criteria: running at least 6km, adult, running for at least 1 year, and having the habit of practicing running at least twice a week. The intervention or placebo will be performed on the leg that is most sore after running. If participants report the same level of pain in both legs or no pain at all, the side to be evaluated and treated will be randomly selected. The endpoints will be measured: Pain and fatigue (EVAN), muscle performance (unipodal vertical jump) and overall affect (perceived global affect scale).

Keywords:
Runner
Recovery
Cupping
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: Not applicable.

Ethics committee approval: Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora - 55265621.2.0000.5147

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.