Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
219
Full text access
THE PAINDETECT QUESTIONNAIRE TRULY IDENTIFIED PRESERVED CONDITIONED PAIN MODULATION IN MOST PATIENTS WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
Visits
155
Juliana Valentim Bittencourt1, Eduardo Gallas Leivas1, Arthur de Sá Ferreira1, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira1,2
1 Postgraduate Program, in Rehabilitation Science, Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2 Department of Physiotherapy, Federal Institute of Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Neuropathic-like symptoms patients had more unfavorable pain features than nociceptive patients. PainDETECT questionnaire have been used to assess the central sensitization sign and symptoms. Moreover, deficient conditioned pain modulation is common in several neuropathic-like symptoms patients. However, whether the painDETECT questionnaire can identify impairment of the conditioned pain modulation it is still unknown.

Objectives

The current study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the painDETECT questionnaire in detecting the impairment of the conditioned pain modulation in participants with musculoskeletal pain.

Methods

A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted on 308 participants with musculoskeletal pain enrolled consecutively in outpatient departments. The painDETECT questionnaire (index method) was compared with the cold pressor test, the psychophysical test used to assess the conditioned pain modulation (reference standard).

Results

Most participants were female (n = 220, 71.42%) and had a mean age of 52.21 (±15.01). One hundred seventy-three (56.16%) participants were classified as nociceptive pain, 69 (22.40%) as unclear, and 66 (21.42%) as neuropathic-like symptoms. According to the cold pressor test, 60 (19.48%) participants presented impairment of conditioned pain modulation. The cutoff point of 12 of the painDETECT questionnaire showed values of diagnostic accuracy below 70% compared to the cold pressor test, except for a negative predictive value [76.98 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 71.72 to 81.51]. The cutoff point of 19 showed high specificity (78.63%, 95% CI 73.00 to 83.56), high negative predictive value (80.58%, 95%CI 78.16 to 82.79), and accuracy of 67.53% when compared to the cold pressor test.

Conclusion

PainDETECT questionnaire is useful for ruling out patients with musculoskeletal pain and impairment of conditioned pain modulation.

Implications

The PainDETECT questionnaire can be used as an initial screening strategy by healthcare professionals to screen for neuropathic-like symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Researchers should use instruments with high precision to assess the presence of signs and symptoms related to central sensitization and neuropathic-type symptoms to confirm the findings of the present study. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of painDETECT is just one of the considerations when determining a screening tool for musculoskeletal pain. Therefore, additional aspects must be considered.

Keywords:
Musculoskeletal Pain
Neuropathic Pain
Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: This study was financed in part by the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [Grant number: E-26/211.104/2021] and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [Finance Code 001; Grant number: 88881.708719/2022-01, grant number: 88887.708718/2022-00, and grant number 88887.466981/2019-00].

Ethics committee approval: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Federal Institute of Rio de Janeiro (number: 02228818.0.3001.5258).

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.