Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
32
Full text access
THE MOTOR BEHAVIOR OF PRETERM VS FULL-TERM INFANTS TO EARLY IDENTIFY RISK FOR NEUROMOTOR DISORDERS – CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Visits
157
Ana Paula Zanardi da Silva1, Stefani Raquel Sales Fritsch1, Carolina Fioroni Ribeiro da Silva1, Eloisa Tudella1
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Nucleus of Neuropediatrics and Motricity Studies, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Prematurity has a high incidence in Brazil and worldwide. It is an important risk factor for neuromotor disorders, such as cerebral palsy. Early detection may be performed by the assessment of General Movements (GMs) and the Infant Motor Profile (IMP), which have adequate psychometric properties. Early detection is essential to refer infants to early intervention as soon as possible so they may take advantage of their sensitive development period.

Objective

To compare the motor behavior of preterm vs full-term infants at 4 months of age to identify risks for neuromotor disorders early.

Methods

At 4 months of age, 5 preterm infants with corrected age (35.6 ± 1.0 weeks of gestational age [GA]) were evaluated, exposed group (EG); and 5 term infants (39.5 ± 0.8 weeks GA), comparison group (CG). The dependent variable was motor behavior, measured by the Assessment of the quality of GMs, Hadders-Algra classification, and the IMP. The assessment of GMs classifies motor behavior into normal optimal, normal suboptimal, moderately abnormal, and abnormal categories, according to the complexity, variation, and fluency of the GMs. The IMP evaluates variation, adaptability, fluency, symmetry, and performance. Assessments were scored independently by two physiotherapists who were blinded to the groups and had adequate inter- and intra-reliability. Descriptive analysis and comparison tests between groups were applied (independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney test), significance level < 0.05, by the SPSS.

Results

The EG had significantly the lowest GA (p-value<0.00; Cohen's r=0.90), weight (p-value=0.05; Cohen's r=0.57), and head circumference at birth (p- p-value=0.05; Cohen's r=0.58). The EG showed significantly less motor behavior variation in the IMP (p-value=0.01; Cohen's r=0.58) in comparison with CG. The infants did not present a significant difference regarding the classifications of the GMs. However, it was observed that only one infant from the EG presented the definitely abnormal category, at 4 months of age.

Conclusion

Premature infants showed less variation in motor behavior. Drawing attention to preterm infants is needed, as the atypical variation may indicate a high risk for neuromotor disorders. All infants evaluated in the present study were born during social isolation, a strategy to contain the pandemic caused by COVID-19. This fact may reflect the lack of significant difference between the groups in the evaluation of the GMs and in domains of IMP, i.e., adaptability, fluency, symmetry, performance, and IMP total score. Thus, the importance of monitoring the development of infants with predictive tools for early detection is highlighted.

Implications

Deficits in motor behavior domains during the first months of life may be indicative of risks for neuromotor disorders. It may be used as a parameter to indicate alterations in the structures and functions of infants at risk. Infants in the first months of life must be evaluated and monitored since early detection is fundamental to individualized early intervention diagnosis, prematurity; child development.

Keywords:
Infants
Neuromotor
Physical Therapy
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments: The State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (process number 2018/24930-0) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel-Brazil (CAPES) – Financing Code 001.

Ethics committee approval: Federal University of São Carlos, CAAE: 53675221.5.0000.5504

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.