
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
More infoPrematurity has a high incidence in Brazil and worldwide. It is an important risk factor for neuromotor disorders, such as cerebral palsy. Early detection may be performed by the assessment of General Movements (GMs) and the Infant Motor Profile (IMP), which have adequate psychometric properties. Early detection is essential to refer infants to early intervention as soon as possible so they may take advantage of their sensitive development period.
ObjectiveTo compare the motor behavior of preterm vs full-term infants at 4 months of age to identify risks for neuromotor disorders early.
MethodsAt 4 months of age, 5 preterm infants with corrected age (35.6 ± 1.0 weeks of gestational age [GA]) were evaluated, exposed group (EG); and 5 term infants (39.5 ± 0.8 weeks GA), comparison group (CG). The dependent variable was motor behavior, measured by the Assessment of the quality of GMs, Hadders-Algra classification, and the IMP. The assessment of GMs classifies motor behavior into normal optimal, normal suboptimal, moderately abnormal, and abnormal categories, according to the complexity, variation, and fluency of the GMs. The IMP evaluates variation, adaptability, fluency, symmetry, and performance. Assessments were scored independently by two physiotherapists who were blinded to the groups and had adequate inter- and intra-reliability. Descriptive analysis and comparison tests between groups were applied (independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney test), significance level < 0.05, by the SPSS.
ResultsThe EG had significantly the lowest GA (p-value<0.00; Cohen's r=0.90), weight (p-value=0.05; Cohen's r=0.57), and head circumference at birth (p- p-value=0.05; Cohen's r=0.58). The EG showed significantly less motor behavior variation in the IMP (p-value=0.01; Cohen's r=0.58) in comparison with CG. The infants did not present a significant difference regarding the classifications of the GMs. However, it was observed that only one infant from the EG presented the definitely abnormal category, at 4 months of age.
ConclusionPremature infants showed less variation in motor behavior. Drawing attention to preterm infants is needed, as the atypical variation may indicate a high risk for neuromotor disorders. All infants evaluated in the present study were born during social isolation, a strategy to contain the pandemic caused by COVID-19. This fact may reflect the lack of significant difference between the groups in the evaluation of the GMs and in domains of IMP, i.e., adaptability, fluency, symmetry, performance, and IMP total score. Thus, the importance of monitoring the development of infants with predictive tools for early detection is highlighted.
ImplicationsDeficits in motor behavior domains during the first months of life may be indicative of risks for neuromotor disorders. It may be used as a parameter to indicate alterations in the structures and functions of infants at risk. Infants in the first months of life must be evaluated and monitored since early detection is fundamental to individualized early intervention diagnosis, prematurity; child development.
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments: The State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (process number 2018/24930-0) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel-Brazil (CAPES) – Financing Code 001.
Ethics committee approval: Federal University of São Carlos, CAAE: 53675221.5.0000.5504