
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a prevalent condition affecting individuals of all ages. CLBP is characterized by persistent pain symptoms lasting more than three months and is associated with significant impacts on functioning. Pain Science Education (PSE) is recommended for managing CLBP by helping patients reconceptualize non-adaptive beliefs about pain. Nevertheless, assessing the effectiveness of pain education interventions requires instruments that address the construct of pain neurophysiology understanding, such as the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ). The NPQ is useful, but data on its reliability in the Brazilian population with CLBP are limited.
ObjectivesTo provide preliminary data on the reliability of the revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (rNPQ-Br) in CLBP patients.
MethodsThis study presents initial data regarding the measurement properties of the rNPQ-Br in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Participants were assessed for sociodemographic characteristics, pain intensity using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), and disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which ranges from 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximum disability). The questionnaires were administered in two sessions with a one-week time interval. The clinical stability of the patients was monitored by evaluating the intensity of pain in both sessions; patients not stable were excluded from the study (variation in the NPRS score > 2). Test-retest reliability of the rNPQ-Br was analyzed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The ICC (2,1) was calculated using a two-way random effects model with absolute agreement. ICC values = 0.70 were interpreted as acceptable reliability, according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criterion for good quality of reliability.
ResultsFifty participants with non-specific CLBP participated in this study, including 28 women and 22 men. The mean age was 22 years (standard deviation [SD] = 37.31) for men and 28 years (SD = 45) for women. Mean weight was 83 kg (SD = 10.88) for men and 76.75 kg (SD = 15.66) for women, while mean height was 173 cm (SD = 7.24) for men and 164 cm (SD = 7) for women. Mean pain duration was 7.45 years (SD = 7.56) for men and 9.18 years (SD = 10.44) for women. Mean NPRS scores were 5.31 (SD = 1.35) for men and 6.35 (SD = 1.55) for women, and mean ODI (0-100) scores were 29.00 (SD = 7.42) for men and 28.89 (SD = 8.79) for women. The data showed an ICC(2,1) = 0.5 (95% CI: 0.12–0.72), indicating no acceptable reliability for the rNPQ-Br total score in CLBP.
ConclusionThe rNPQ-Br total score can assess patients' understanding of the neurophysiology of pain in chronic musculoskeletal conditions. However, in CLBP, the reliability was below acceptable levels (< 0.50). This preliminary study's findings should be interpreted with caution.
ImplicationsAt this time, rNPQ-Br total score shows insufficient levels of reliability, and its use in clinical practice cannot yet be recommended.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding: FAPESP - 2023/08519-7.
Ethics committee approval: Not applicable.
Registration: Prospero - CRD42024542695.
