Journal Information
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
120
Full text access
PAIN DURING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE IN WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Visits
5
Clara Maria de Araujo Silva, Ana Carolina Sartorato Beleza, Amanda Feroldi, Giovana Garçoni Poli, Mariana Paleari Zanoni, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato, Daiana Priscila Rodrigues-de-Souza, Francisco Alburquerque-Sendín
Postgraduate Program in Physiotherapy of the Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 29. Issue S1

II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference

More info
Background

Pain during sexual activity can alter the sexual response cycle, potentially leading to sexual dysfunction. Often underestimated in healthcare consultations, pain during sexual activity can negatively impact women's quality of life.

Objectives

To assess the frequency of pain during sexual activity in women with and without sexual dysfunction.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study that included women aged = 18 years who reported having had sexual activity in the last four weeks. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee. Data were collected through an electronic form containing sociodemographic questions and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire to assess the presence of sexual dysfunction in six domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain). The risk of sexual dysfunction was considered for women with a total FSFI score = 26.55, and domain-specific cut-off points were < 2.4 for desire and < 3.6 for the other domains. A descriptive analysis was conducted to determine the frequency of pain during sexual activity in women with and without sexual dysfunction.

Results

Regarding sexual dysfunction, they were presented by domain and total FSFI score. Results: A total of 621 women participated, of whom 197 (31.72%) were at risk of developing sexual dysfunction and 424 (68.28%) were not. The mean age in the dysfunction group was 30.5 ± 9.3 years, while in the non-dysfunction group, it was 29.5 ± 8.6 years. A total of 94 (42.2%) women reported experiencing pain during sexual intercourse, including 75 (38%) in the dysfunction group and 19 (4.4%) in the non-dysfunction group. This was based on their response to the question: “Over the past 4 weeks, how often did you experience discomfort or pain during vaginal penetration?”. Regarding FSFI domains, the results for women with and without sexual dysfunction, respectively, were: 4.2 (±1.0) and 2.8 (±1.0) for desire, 5.3 (±0.5) and 3.5 (±1.0) for arousal, 5.4 (±0.7) and 3.9 (±1.1) for lubrication, 5.1 (±0.9) and 3.4 (±1.3) for orgasm, and 5.5 (±0.6) and 4.0 (±1.2) for pain.

Conclusion

The results indicate that women with and without sexual dysfunction experience pain during sexual intercourse. Thus, it is necessary to develop screening strategies and provide guidance to the population for the prevention and treatment of pain during sexual activity.

Implications

The study highlights the presence of pain during sexual activity in women with and without sexual dysfunction, reinforcing the need for greater attention to this issue in clinical practice. Given that pain during intercourse can negatively impact social life and overall well-being, healthcare professionals—particularly physiotherapists—should integrate sexual health assessment into their routine care. In physiotherapy practice, these findings emphasize the importance of pelvic floor rehabilitation strategies, pain management techniques, and patient education on sexual health. From a policy perspective, incorporating sexual function assessments into broader women’s health programs could facilitate early intervention.

Keywords:
Pain
Sexual Dysfunctions
Psychological
Women's Health
Full text is only available in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding: This study was funded by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant 2019/14666-7) and supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES – Brazil, Finance Code 001).

Ethics committee approval: CAAE: 84827724.2.0000.5180.

Registration: Not applicable.

Download PDF
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools