Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
224
Full text access
NOT FROM THE START, BUT IN TIME! SHAPING CONSENSUS ON TERMINOLOGY AND RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN TELEHEALTH IN MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
Visits
112
Junior Fandim1, Bruno Saragiotto1,2
1 Masters and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
2 Discipline of Physiotherapy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Telehealth is an emerging field of study and has drawn attention to deliver health service to patients. Recently findings demonstrated heterogeneity in the telehealth terminology between stakeholders and a lack of agenda for research priorities in telehealth in musculoskeletal pain research.

Objectives

Consensus on standardization of terminology to be used in telehealth among all interested parties in musculoskeletal pain. Establish research priorities for the practice of musculoskeletal pain telehealth.

Methods

This is an international modified three-round e-Delphi survey. We invited researchers, clinicians, consumer representatives, industry partners/developers, healthcare managers, and policymakers identified via Expertscape, PubMed database, social media, and a snowball sampling strategy to recruit other potential participants. We sent a survey by email with a link to the Typeform® platform. We provided a list of potential terminologies and research priorities based on published studies with adjustments through the International Steering Committee and presented to panel members’ participants. Firstly, panel members selected a range of telehealth terminologies for musculoskeletal pain research known. Subsequently, panel members were asked to rate the level of agreement of each terminology to be used in musculoskeletal pain research and the research priorities for musculoskeletal pain research field. A 5-point Likert scale was used to rate the level of agreement of each item and a priori cut-off points of at least 80% were used to establish consensus. Descriptive analysis of the results was performed with mean and standard deviations, and absolute and relative frequencies.

Results

From 694 potential participants invited, 160-panel members participated in the first round, 133 in the second round, and 134 in the third round. The rate of response from panel members for the second round was 83.1% and for the third round was 83.7%. The majority of the panel members were researchers 47.5%, clinicians 35.6% and consumers representatives 5.6%, mean age 41.6 (10.9), living in Brazil 19.4%, India 13.8%, and Australia 11.9%. Panel members reached a consensus on two terminologies and 14 research priorities from an initial list of 37 terminologies and 19 research priorities over the three rounds. Panel members reached a consensus for “digital health” and “telehealth” as standard terminologies. Panel members also reached a consensus for 14 research priorities considering featuring topics such as study designs, treatment effectiveness and implementation, education, health literacy and health equity for musculoskeletal pain research.

Conclusion

All stakeholders reached a consensus that the “digital health” and “telehealth” terminologies may be the most common and possibly standardized terminologies to be used for the moment. Stakeholders also identified a set of 14 telehealth musculoskeletal pain research priorities worldwide centered on community health needs.

Implications

Consensus on terminology will enable a clear communication about the use of communication and information technology in healthcare among people with musculoskeletal disorders. Establishing a set of research priorities based on the stakeholders needs allows a research agenda on key questions to be developed and achieved.

Keywords:
Telehealth
Health priorities
Musculoskeletal pain
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments: *Telehealth and Musculoskeletal Pain Steering Committee Members (Rana S Hinman, Cecilie K Øverås, Saurab Sharma, Joletta Belton, Vinícius C Oliveira, Blake F Dear, Romy Parker, Babita Ghai, Kim L Bennell, Paulo Ferreira, Jan Hartvigsen) Partially funded by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES); and São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (nº 2021/05477-6).

Ethics committee approval: Research Ethics Committee - Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (approval number: 40705620.5.0000.0064). Register: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/tqmz2/)

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.