Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
354
Full text access
EXPLORING MOBILITY DYSFUNCTION IN PEOPLE WITH AND WITHOUT IMPAIRED COGNITION IN PARKINSON DISEASE
Visits
154
Natália Mariano Barboza1, Martina Mancini2, Suhaila Mahmoud Smaili1, Fay Horak2, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta2, Laurie King2
1 Grupo de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Neurofuncional, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brasil
2 Departament of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, United States of America
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

The relationship between mobility and cognition has been studied in the elderly population. In atypical aging, such as Parkinson´s disease (PD), these associations have also been reported. It is believed that people with PD may compensate for mobility deficits using increased attentional resources to overcome deficit. This phenomenon reflects the importance of understanding the relationship between mobility and cognition.

Objectives

To compare gait and balance characteristics in PD individuals with and without cognitive impairment.

Methods

Cross-sectional study, comprising 143 participants with PD divided into two groups according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cut-off: 1) without cognitive impairment (MoCA > 26) and 2) with cognitive impairment (MoCA ≤ 26). Groups were compared through instrumented and clinical measures for gait and balance in the following domains: sensory orientation, anticipatory postural adjustments, automatic postural responses, and dynamic gait. Clinical measures were obtained from Mini-BESTest. Instrumented measures of gait and balance were obtained via six wearable sensors (Opals, APDM Wearable Technologies, A Clario company), each including triaxial accelerometers, triaxial gyroscopes, and magnetometers, placed on both feet, wrists, sternum, and the lumbar region while performing a total of eight different motor tasks. For data analysis, t-test for independent samples and a general linear model were carried out using the SPSS 28.0.

Results

72 individuals had cognitive impairment and 71 were considered without cognitive impairment. There was no difference in the total Mini-BESTest score between groups, however, in the dynamic gait domain there was a difference between groups (p=0.010), in which the group with cognitive impairment presented worse performance in dynamic gait when compared to the group without cognitive impairment (p=0.010). When looking at the instrumented measures for gait and balance domains, all significant group differences were under the dynamic gait domain, specifically, dual task gait speed (p=0.004), dual cost stride length (p=0.016), stance time (p=0.038), and turn velocity (p=0.037). For all the instrumented measures where it was possible to verify differences between groups, the worst performance in dynamic gait was presented by the group with cognitive impairment.

Conclusion

Dynamic gait performance was worse in individuals with PD who had cognitive impairment compared to individuals without cognitive impairment, both for clinical and instrumented measures.

Implications

Gait performance differs between individuals with and without cognitive impairment. This fact helps to guide the clinician therapeutic prescription, prioritizing gait training for individuals with PD, rehabilitation strategies focused on mobility, as well as approaches that treat gait and cognition simultaneously, particularly for individuals who have cognitive impairments.

Keywords:
Parkinson Disease
Mobility Limitation
Cognition
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: For Balance Disorders Laboratory researchers, ADPM Wearable Technology is a potential conflict of interest reviewed and managed by OHSU.

Acknowledgment: Grupo de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Neurofuncional (GPFIN). Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – (CAPES). Balance Disorders Laboratory (OHSU).

Ethics committee approval: Oregon Health & Science University institutional review board (approval no. 4131) and the joint OHSU and Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS) institutional review board (approval no. 8979).

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.