
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
More infoThe relationship between mobility and cognition has been studied in the elderly population. In atypical aging, such as Parkinson´s disease (PD), these associations have also been reported. It is believed that people with PD may compensate for mobility deficits using increased attentional resources to overcome deficit. This phenomenon reflects the importance of understanding the relationship between mobility and cognition.
ObjectivesTo compare gait and balance characteristics in PD individuals with and without cognitive impairment.
MethodsCross-sectional study, comprising 143 participants with PD divided into two groups according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cut-off: 1) without cognitive impairment (MoCA > 26) and 2) with cognitive impairment (MoCA ≤ 26). Groups were compared through instrumented and clinical measures for gait and balance in the following domains: sensory orientation, anticipatory postural adjustments, automatic postural responses, and dynamic gait. Clinical measures were obtained from Mini-BESTest. Instrumented measures of gait and balance were obtained via six wearable sensors (Opals, APDM Wearable Technologies, A Clario company), each including triaxial accelerometers, triaxial gyroscopes, and magnetometers, placed on both feet, wrists, sternum, and the lumbar region while performing a total of eight different motor tasks. For data analysis, t-test for independent samples and a general linear model were carried out using the SPSS 28.0.
Results72 individuals had cognitive impairment and 71 were considered without cognitive impairment. There was no difference in the total Mini-BESTest score between groups, however, in the dynamic gait domain there was a difference between groups (p=0.010), in which the group with cognitive impairment presented worse performance in dynamic gait when compared to the group without cognitive impairment (p=0.010). When looking at the instrumented measures for gait and balance domains, all significant group differences were under the dynamic gait domain, specifically, dual task gait speed (p=0.004), dual cost stride length (p=0.016), stance time (p=0.038), and turn velocity (p=0.037). For all the instrumented measures where it was possible to verify differences between groups, the worst performance in dynamic gait was presented by the group with cognitive impairment.
ConclusionDynamic gait performance was worse in individuals with PD who had cognitive impairment compared to individuals without cognitive impairment, both for clinical and instrumented measures.
ImplicationsGait performance differs between individuals with and without cognitive impairment. This fact helps to guide the clinician therapeutic prescription, prioritizing gait training for individuals with PD, rehabilitation strategies focused on mobility, as well as approaches that treat gait and cognition simultaneously, particularly for individuals who have cognitive impairments.
Conflict of interest: For Balance Disorders Laboratory researchers, ADPM Wearable Technology is a potential conflict of interest reviewed and managed by OHSU.
Acknowledgment: Grupo de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Neurofuncional (GPFIN). Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – (CAPES). Balance Disorders Laboratory (OHSU).
Ethics committee approval: Oregon Health & Science University institutional review board (approval no. 4131) and the joint OHSU and Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS) institutional review board (approval no. 8979).