
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
More infothe importance of assessing patient mobility has been described in the literature. Recognition of low mobility on admission or declining mobility status during hospitalization should lead to early involvement by staff, including physiotherapists. It is important to know the level of functional capacity in the short and long term, after the surgical procedure, so that it is possible to adequately direct the health care that goes beyond the clinical solution of the disease, prolonging the desired functional recovery.
Objectivesto describe the mobility index assessed on the first postoperative day, according to the JH-HLM scale, in cancer patients who underwent preoperative physical therapy intervention or not.
Methodsobservational, retrospective study with a quantitative approach. Sociodemographic and clinical data as well as mobility data were obtained from the electronic database of the physiotherapy service of the surgical clinic of the Hospital Universitário de Brasília and confirmed in the electronic medical record available in the Management Application for University Hospitals (AGHU). The mobility assessment was performed using the Johns Hopkins Highest Mobility Scale (JH-HLM).
Resultsthe study sample consisted of seventy-six patients, most women (76.31%), with a mean age of 56.44 years. In the comparison between the groups, at the time of the postoperative period, there was a significant difference (p = 0.029) in the mobility of the group that underwent preoperative physiotherapy (mean 7.3; median 8; interquartile 6.5-8) and the group who did not undergo preoperative physiotherapy (mean 6.09; median 7; interquartile 5-8).
Conclusionthe group that underwent preoperative physiotherapy had a higher mobility index than the group that did not undergo this intervention.
ImplicationsBased on the positive result of the physical therapy intervention in the preoperative period on the mobility index of patients, it is possible to implement a structured protocol for monitoring surgical patients at different times during their hospitalization, providing better functional results until discharge.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment: Not applicable.
Ethics committee approval: The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Ceilândia Faculty of the University of Brasília (3,022,045), in accordance with ethical standards of norms and regulatory guidelines for research involving human beings, in accordance with Resolution 466, of 2012, of the National Health Council.