Journal Information
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
34
Full text access
EFFECTS OF INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING ON DYSPNEA AND LUNG CAPACITY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Visits
121
Juliana Rodrigues da Silva, Julio Henrique Policarpo, Mônica Soares de Oliveira, Tiago Moraes De Macedo, Lilian Maria Melo da Silva, Kaique Ferreira Alves, Diego de Sousa Dantas, Patricia Erika M Marinho
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 29. Issue S1

II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference

More info
Background

Respiratory muscle weakness has been shown to be frequent in patients undergoing hemodialysis. In this context, inspiratory muscle training (IMT) emerges as an alternative to improve the respiratory condition of these patients.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of IMT on dyspnea and lung capacity in dialysis patients. The effect on respiratory muscle strength was evaluated as a secondary outcome, as well as the dialysis efficacy index (Kt/V).

Methods

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated the effects of IMT in dialysis patients on the outcomes of dyspnea, lung capacity, respiratory muscle strength and dialysis effectiveness index (Kt/V) was conducted. Searches were completed in February 2025 in the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, LILACS, CINAHL, PEDro, Web of Science, Embase and Google Scholar databases. The search strategy consisted of the following Keywords “Renal Institution, Chronic”, “Dialyses, Renal”, “Breathing Exercises”, “Dyspnea” and “Respiratory Function Tests” in different combinations. Studies with adult participants (> 18 years) with CKD on hemodialysis were included. The intervention was evaluating inspiratory muscle training with linear load. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool.

Results

Six studies were analyzed (n = 210). One study showed an improvement in dyspnea [4.17±0.58; 95%CI (0.0073-0.884); p = 0.022], and the meta-analyses found a mean difference of 0.34 L/min [95%CI (0.08–0.61); p = 0.010] in forced vital capacity (FVC) and 25.15 cmH2O [95%CI (17.05–33.24); p < 0.001] in maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) in the IMT groups. There was no difference in Kt/V. Only one study showed a low risk of bias.

Conclusion

IMT in patients with CKD on HD improved dyspnea, FVC and MIP. Considering the low quality of the studies, new RCTs with greater methodological rigor are needed.

Implications

Understanding the effects of IMT on patients receiving hemodialysis leads to more effective interventions for common respiratory symptoms in these individuals.

Keywords:
Hemodialysis
Respiratory therapy
Dyspnea
Full text is only available in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding: Not applicable.

Ethics committee approval: CAAE: 65207222.1.0000.5152.

Registration: Not applicable.

Download PDF
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools