Journal Information
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
238
Full text access
EFFECTS OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION ON PAIN IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS DURING ONE-MONTH INTERVENTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Visits
154
Camille Tainá Soares Serique Gatoa, Érick Augusto Pureza Teixeirab, João Silvino Pereira Netoc, Caio de Souza Nascimentoc, Tamara Silva de Sousad, Roger Andrey Carvalho Jardimd, Areolino Pena Matose, Natália Iosimutaf
a Physiotherapy student, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brazil
b Master’s student, Post-Graduation in Health Science, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brazil
c Master’s, Post-Graduation in Health Science, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brazil
d Post-Graduation in Health Science, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brazil
e Physiotherapy Course, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Belém, PA, Brazil
f Physiotherapy Course, Post-Graduation in Health Science, Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP), Macapá, AP, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 29. Issue S1

II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference

More info
Background

Physical exercises are strongly recommended for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, when subjected to loads that overload the joint, these individuals may experience worsened symptoms and low adherence to treatment. Evidence shows that exercises combined with Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) allow for strength and muscle endurance gains using lighter loads. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate whether this method can help patients reduce pain and joint discomfort as effectively as exercises with heavier loads.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of 40% occlusion with blood flow restriction in improving pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

Clinical study with 16 patients (12 women, 4 men; average age 51.31 ± (9.1) years), divided into three groups: 40% BFR + Rest (n = 4), 40% BFR + Low Load (n = 6), and HIRE (High Intensity Resistance Exercise) + Placebo (n = 6). Pain was assessed before and after one month using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Results

Regarding the initial pain scale, the averages were: 3.5 ± 3.3 for the 40% BFR + Rest group, 6 ± 3.16 for the 40% BFR + Low Load group, and 3.83 ± 3.25 for the HIRE + Placebo group. Regarding the final pain scale, the averages were: 3 ± 3.4 for the 40% BFR + Rest group, 4 ± 3.87 for the 40% BFR + Low Load group, and 0.6 ± 1.21 for the HIRE + Placebo group. Thus, when evaluating pain levels before and after one month of treatment, the 40% BFR + Rest group showed a pain reduction of approximately 14% on average, while the 40% BFR + Low Load group demonstrated a reduction of around 33%, and the HIRE + Placebo group reduced the average by about 84%, indicating a greater improvement in pain compared to the 40% BFR + Rest and 40% BFR + Low Load groups.

Conclusion

Thus, it is concluded that all groups showed improvement in the investigated outcome, but the group using high loads (HIRE + Placebo) still appears to be more effective in reducing knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis.

Implications

It is expected that the results of this clinical study will clarify the applicability and implementation of 40% BFR in the rehabilitation of OA.

Keywords:
Pain
Knee Osteoarthritis
Blood Flow Restriction Therapy
Full text is only available in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding: Scientific Initiation Program of the Brazilian Hospital Services Company Network (Ebserh) with the support of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Ethics committee approval: CAAE: 75372813.3.0000.5102.

Registration: Not applicable.

Download PDF
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools