Journal Information
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
204
Full text access
DOES METABOLIC EXERCISES AFTER ACUTE ANKLE SPRAIN REDUCE PAIN? A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Visits
3
Bruna Batista Da Casa, Andreza Evaldt De Limaa, Guilherme S. Nunesa, Brenda Dutra Guterresb, Lorenzo de Carvalho Leitãoa, Gabriela Beck Alianoa, Lucas dos Santos Costab, Maria Eduarda Victurino Stangherlina
a Departamento de Fisioterapia e Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
b Programa de pós-graduação em Ciências do Movimento e Reabilitação, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 29. Issue S1

II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference

More info
Background

Ankle sprains are common injuries that can significantly impact daily activities. One of the most frequent complications is pain, which interferes with functional recovery. Edema is known to contribute to pain, potentially hindering treatment progress. Metabolic exercises are commonly used to manage edema, yet their effectiveness remains unclear, highlighting the need for a better understanding of their role in rehabilitation.

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of combining metabolic exercises with the usual care protocol on pain intensity in individuals with acute ankle sprains, compared to the usual care protocol alone.

Methods

The study was a randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated into two groups. One group followed a metabolic exercise protocol (experimental group, EG) in addition to the usual care protocol, while the other group received only the usual care protocol (control group, CG). The usual care protocol consisted of cryotherapy applied three times daily for 20 minutes over five days, with the ankle elevated at an angle of 30 to 45 degrees of hip flexion, combined with elevation and compression using a bandage. The metabolic exercise protocol involved active mobilization exercises performed three times daily over five days. Participants were instructed to lie on their backs with their hips flexed at 30 to 45 degrees and perform the following exercises: (i) Continuous active plantar and dorsiflexion movements for five minutes; and (ii) Continuous active ankle circumduction movements in clockwise and counterclockwise directions for five minutes. Participants were advised to perform the exercises in a pain-free range of motion and to gradually increase movement speed over the course of the intervention. To assess the effect of metabolic exercises, pain intensity changes from baseline were compared between groups using an independent t-test.

Results

Four-nine participants were included (EG = 25, CG = 24), with 10 dropouts during the protocols (EG = 4, CG = 6). The mean age was 26 years, and randomization occurred, on average, 58 hours after the sprain. Regarding pain intensity, the EG reported a mean pain score of 3.3 points (±1.6) before the intervention and 2.1 points (±1.5) after. In the CG, pain intensity was 3.5 points (±1.8) before the intervention and 1.6 (±1.4) after. The between-group comparison showed a mean difference of -0.8 (95% confidence interval: -0.4 to 1.9), indicating that this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). The effect size was 0.40, suggesting a small difference between groups.

Conclusion

The addition of metabolic exercises to usual care did not result in a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity in individuals with acute ankle sprains compared to usual care alone.

Implications

Metabolic exercises targeting pain reduction after acute ankle sprain does not appear to provide additional clinical benefits. However, as the intervention was not harmful and may be beneficial for other rehabilitation outcomes, clinicians may consider incorporating it based on patient preference.

Keywords:
Ankle Injuries
Pain Perception
Treatment Outcome
Full text is only available in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding: CNPq and FAPERGS.

Ethics committee approval: No. 2.107.552.

Registration: Not applicable.

Download PDF
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools