Journal Information
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
Vol. 29. Issue S1.
II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference
(1 November 2025)
231
Full text access
COMPARISON OF THE SCIATIC AND MEDIAN NERVES NEURODYNAMIC IN ASYMPTOMATIC OLDER ADULTS AND YOUNGER ADULTS: OBSERVATIONAL CASE-CONTROL STUDY
Visits
110
Ricardo Liberalli Miguez, Rayssa de Vilhena Moreira, Maria Alice Mainenti Pagnez, Pedro Teixeira Vidinha Rodrigues, Gustavo Felicio Telles, Leandro Alberto Calazans Nogueira
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 29. Issue S1

II ABRAPG-FT Student Conference

More info
Background

Healthy peripheral nerves have the ability to adapt to increased neurodynamic tension generated by body movements. However, this adaptive capacity is reduced in pathological conditions. Although peripheral neuropathies are common in older adults, there is an absence of knowledge about the behavior of peripheral nerves in asymptomatic older adults.

Objectives

To compare the behavior of the sciatic and median nerves to neurodynamic tension in older adults and asymptomatic adults.

Methods

Sixty-eight asymptomatic participants (34 older adults and 34 sex-matched adults) were evaluated by ultrasound imaging of the sciatic and median nerves, in two positions with different degrees of neurodynamic tension for each nerve. For the median nerve, the first position kept the participant's right upper limb at 90 degrees of shoulder abduction and external rotation, elbow flexion at 90 degrees, forearm supination with the palm facing the participant, and the wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint in a neutral position. In position 2, the second examiner passively extended the elbow, wrist, and metacarpophalangeal joint until the perception of resistance limits the range of motion. For the sciatic nerve, the hip flexion was maintained at 60° in both positions. In Position 1, the knee was flexed at 90 degrees, and the tibiofibular joint remained neutral. In position 2, the knee was passively extended, and the tibiofibular joint dorsiflexed. The cross-sectional area and the nerve-skin distance of each nerve were measured in each position in both groups. The measurements were compared by analysis of variance for repeated measures.

Results

The sample was predominantly composed of females [n = 25, (73.52%)], with a mean age of 30.47 years (6.84) for adults and 70.47 years (5.22) for older adults. The nerve-to-skin distance increased significantly between positions 1 and 2 for the median nerve (F = 54.04; p < 0.001) and between positions 1 and 2 for the sciatic nerve (F = 107.54; p < 0.001), regardless of age group. Similarly, the cross-sectional area of the sciatic nerve was greater in position 1 compared to position 2 for the sciatic nerve (F = 17.27; p < 0.001). No significant interactions were observed between age group and position for any of the variables, indicating that both adults and older adults responded similarly to the increase in neural tension. Moreover, the sciatic nerve was significantly more superficial in older adults than younger adults (t = -3.09; p = 0.018) in position 2.

Conclusion

The sciatic and median nerves responded similarly to increased tension in older adults and adults for the variables: cross-sectional area of the sciatic and median nerves and the nerve-skin distance of the median nerve. However, for the nerve-to-skin distance of the sciatic nerve, it was observed that the nerve was more superficial in older adults.

Implications

The neurodynamic response to tension was similar between asymptomatic older and younger adults. Although the sciatic nerve was more superficial in older adults, it is reasonably explained by the body mass index difference and the age-related trend of muscle mass decline.

Keywords:
Peripheral Nerves
Ultrasonography
Age Groups
Full text is only available in PDF

Conflict of interest: Os autores declaram não ter conflito de interesse.

Funding: FAPERJ, No. E-26/211.104/2021 and CAPES - Finance Code 001- 88881.708719/2022-01 and 88887.708718/2022-00.

Ethics committee approval: CAAE: 30624320.3.0000.5268.

Registration: Not applicable.

Download PDF
Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools