Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
160
Full text access
COMBINATION OF CLINICAL AND GAIT MEASURES TO CLASSIFY FALLERS AND NON-FALLERS IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE
Visits
129
Hayslenne Andressa Gonçalves de Oliveira Araújo1,2, Rodrigo Vitório2, Suhaila Mahmoud Smaili1
1 Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
2 Physiotherapy department, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina, Paraná, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

The multifactorial nature of falls in Parkinson's disease (PD) is well described. Clinical aspects (e.g., fear of falling and disease severity) and gait deficits (e.g., difficulties with dual task walking and freezing of gait episodes) are among identified risk factors of falling. However, optimal assessment for the identification of fallers remains unclear.

Objectives

To identify clinical and objective gait measures that best discriminate fallers from non-fallers in PD, with suggestions of optimal cutoff scores.

Methods

Cross-sectional study composed by 127 individuals with mild to moderate PD classified as fallers (≥2 falls) or non-fallers based on previous 12 months falls. Clinical measures (demographic, motor, cognitive and patient-reported outcomes) were assessed with standard scales/tests. For measuring gait parameters, participants were asked to walk, at a self-selected pace, back and forth on a straight 9-m walkway for 2 minutes in single and dual-task (i.e., forward digit span) conditions, while instrumented with eight, synchronized inertial sensors at the sternum, lumbar spine, bilaterally on the wrists, shins, and feet. We extracted 24 clinical measurements and 39 objective variables from those instruments. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified measures (separately and in combination) that best discriminate fallers from non-fallers; we calculated the area under the curve (AUC) and identified optimal cutoff scores (i.e., point closest-to-(0,1) corner).

Results

Thirty-one participants (24.4%) were classified as fallers and 96 (75.6%) as non-fallers. Fallers had more severe motor symptoms and more advanced disease stage than non-fallers. Single gait and clinical measures that best classified fallers were foot strike angle (AUC=0.728; cutoff=14.07°) and the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I; AUC=0.716, cutoff=25.5), respectively. Combinations of clinical+gait measures had higher AUCs than combinations of clinical-only or gait-only measures. The best performing combination included FES-I score, New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire score, foot strike angle and trunk transverse range of motion (AUC=0.85).

Conclusion

The combinations of clinical and gait measures have higher discriminative ability in classifying fallers from non-fallers among people with PD than combinations of clinical-only and gait-only measures.

Implications

The falls consequences represent great independence and autonomy loss for patients and high costs to health-care services. In this context, it is necessary to devote attention to falls management in PD, including the identification of PD-specific markers for risk of falling. Therefore, the use of wearable inertial sensors is useful and can enhance the traditional fall risk assessment in PD.

Keywords:
Parkinson
Gait
Falls
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: To participants of Research and Neurofunctional Physiotherapy Group (GPFIN) e for support from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - (CAPES).

Ethics committee approval: London-Bloomsbury NHS Research Ethics Committee (and Health Research Authority; 20/LO/1036, 05/10/2020) and the Institutional Review Board of the Oregon Health & Science University (#9903).

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.