Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
303
Full text access
ASSESSING FUNCTIONING BY WHODAS-12 IN WOMEN WITH DYSMENORRHEA
Visits
118
Maria Eduarda Chinotti Batista da Silva1, Guilherme Tavares de Arruda1, Barbara Inácio da Silva1, Leticia Bianca de Farias1, Mariana Arias Avila1
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Postgraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), Study Group on Chronic Pain (NEDoC), Laboratory of Research on Electrophysical Agents (LAREF)
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Dysmenorrhea is the most common gynecological condition reported by women, and 33% to 50% of them report moderate to severe symptoms. It is defined by menstrual pain in the pelvic region and lower abdomen that can be associated or not to other secondary gynecological conditions (e.g., endometriosis, myoma, adenomyosis). The symptoms are frequently associated with others and can affect women's quality of life and functioning, such as missing school/university/work, decreased sleep quality and fatigue. Those symptoms can be intensified by emotional stress, lower social support and lower socioeconomic conditions. Given the great interference of dysmenorrhea in various spheres of life, a comprehensive evaluation of disability and functioning is necessary for this population.

Objectives

To analyze functioning and the affected domains in women with dysmenorrhea.

Methods

Cross-sectional and online study conducted between 2022 and 2023 with 2,609 Brazilian adult women with dysmenorrhea (27.7 ± 7.4 years old). Pregnant women, with 6 months of puerperium and transgender were excluded. The translated and validated Brazilian Portuguese version of WHODAS-12 for women with dysmenorrhea was used. The WHODAS-12 is an instrument with 12 items developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to briefly assess health and disability and provide the level of general functioning of the following domains: life activities, mobility, cognition, social participation, self-care, and interpersonal relationships. All the items and domains are directly linked to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The maximum score of each domain is 10 points and the higher the score, the greater the disability. Data were analyzed descriptively and presented as the mean and standard deviation in SPSS 22.

Results

The average of life activities domain was 4.7 ± 1.8 points, the mobility domain had 4.5 ± 2 points, the cognition domain had 4.4 ± 1.8 points, social participation had 4.8 ± 2 points, self-care had 2.6 ± 1.2 points, and interpersonal relationships had 4 ± 1.9 points. Interpersonal relationships and life activities were the most affected domains in women with dysmenorrhea.

Conclusion

In addition to pain intensity, the WHODAS-12 provided a screening of other domains of functionality that may be affected in women with dysmenorrhea, such as social participation and activities of daily living.

Implications

From the use of the WHODAS-12, it is possible to evaluate important aspects that are relevant beyond the intensity of pain in women with dysmenorrhea. Thus, clinicians can use WHODAS-12 as a specific and individualized therapeutic goal by approaching the woman from an integrality perspective. In addition, it is also possible to have a broader view of the impact of dysmenorrhea on the quality of life and functioning of Brazilian women.

Keywords:
Dysmenorrhea
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
women's health
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: Funders: CAPES (finance code 001), CNPq and FAPESP (process 2021/11871-9).

Ethics committee approval: Ethics Committee on Human Research, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, CAAE: 52928921.2.1001.5504, Opinion number 5.320.757.

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.