Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
273
Full text access
RISK OF SARCOPENIA AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS IN HOSPITALIZED OLDER ADULTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE
Visits
143
Luciana de Lima Sousa1, Jeremias Bruno Silva de Oliveira1, Paloma Boni de Lima1, Mariana de Grande dos Santos2, Osmair Gomes de Oliveira1, Patrícia Azevedo Garcia1
1 University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
2 Base Hospital. Institute of Strategic Management of the Federal District, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Low muscle strength and mass with possible impaired physical performance characterizes the muscle disease known as sarcopenia. When not diagnosed or treated, the risk of falls, fractures, hospitalization, hospital costs, longer hospital stays, and negative outcomes increases. In the presence of comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases, sarcopenia can be significant and serious. In these patients, muscle weakness has attracted considerable attention in recent years since it is deemed an independent risk factor for disability and a strong predictor of premature death. The SARC-F (simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia), a valid and consistent instrument to detect people at risk of adverse outcomes associated with sarcopenia, including functional decline, can be used as a screening tool. It consists of 5 items self-reported by patients based on their perceptions regarding strength limitations, the ability to walk, rise from a chair, climb stairs and a number of falls.

Objectives

Analyze the risk of sarcopenia and identify associated factors in hospitalized older adults with cardiovascular disease.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study conducted with 23 hospitalized older adults with cardiovascular disease in a tertiary hospital of the Federal District, Brazil, classified into two groups: with or without risk of sarcopenia according to the SARC-F. Demographic (age and sex), clinical (number of medications and body mass index –BMI) and physical data (muscle strength and mass) were collected. Muscle strength was assessed using handgrip dynamometry and the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, and mass by means of electrical bioimpedance. These data were compared between the groups using the student´s t and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

There was a risk of sarcopenia in 39.1% (n=9) of the sample. In comparison analyses, the group of older adults at risk of sarcopenia were older (mean difference: 14.39 years [95%CI 8.23 – 20.55]; p=0.001), exhibited lower handgrip strength (mean difference: 9.36 KgF [95%CI 0.874 – 17.854]; p=0.032), more frequent muscle weakness on the MRC scale (X²(1)=5.367, p=0.047) and lower appendicular muscle mass (mean difference: 0.763 [95%CI 0.113 – 1.414]; p=0.024). The groups showed no differences for sex, BMI and number of continuous use drugs (p>0.05).

Conclusion

This study found that older adults at risk of sarcopenia are older and obtain worse physical results when compared to their risk-free counterparts. The SARC-F was able to identify hospitalized patients with lower strength and muscle mass.

Implications

The findings show the need to identify hospitalized older adults at risk of sarcopenia using a simple, fast, low-cost, noninvasive assessment, which may contribute to the establishment of early identification strategies in a hospital setting, aimed at developing more assertive measures.

Keywords:
Aged
Sarcopenia
Risk Factors
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank the support of the University of Brasília - Faculdade de Ceilândia, Base Hospital, FAPDF and the permission of all participants.

Ethics committee approval: Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Ceilândia of the University of Brasília (UnB) – CEP/FCE (number 5.732.270)

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.