Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
13
Full text access
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAPABILITY AND PERFORMANCE IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY IN THE FEDERAL DISTRICT
Visits
160
Amanda Larissa Oliveira Lima1, Nadine Oliveira Cabral1, Thamiris da Silva dos Santos1, Ranny Keatlyn de Oliveira1, Kênnea Martins Almeida1, Aline Martins de Toledo1
1 Departamento de Fisioterapia, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

The child with Cerebral Palsy (CP) presents different ways of locomotion which are influenced by the environment and can act as a facilitator or a barrier. According to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), capacity refers to abilities in a controlled situation and environment and indicates the maximum level of functionality for a given moment, with minimal influence of environmental factors. On the other hand, performance refers to the execution of activities in everyday environments, such as home, school, and community, considering the environment in which the child is inserted. The difference between capacity and performance expresses the impacts of the controlled environment and the customary environment, allowing guidance on what can be modified in the environment to improve performance.

Objectives

To verify the relationship between ability and mobility performance in three different environments in children and adolescents with Cerebral Palsy in the Federal District and surroundings.

Methods

This is a Cross-sectional study. Thirty-eight children, from age 4 to 17 years old (±7.4 years), diagnosed with CP at all five levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) were included. Mobility capacity was verified using the Gross Motor Function Measure test score, version 66 (GMFM-66). Performance was evaluated using the Function Mobility Scale (FMS), in the home, school, and community environments, in 8 levels: 6- independent on all surfaces; 5- independent on ground surfaces; 4- uses canes, 3- crutches; 2- walker; 1- wheelchair; N- does not complete the distances; C - crawls. The sample characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Spearman (r) correlation was performed between GMFM-66 scores and FMS levels in the three environments (home, school, and community). The strengths of the correlations were determined as follows: r=0.00-0.19 very weak correlation, r=0.20-0.39 weak correlation, r=0.40-0.59 moderate correlation, r=0 .60-0.79 strong correlation, r=0.80-1.00 very strong correlation.

Results

38 children with CP participated, 62% male, 76.5% with bilateral impairment, 26.3% GMFCS V, 15.8% GMFCS IV, 10.5% GMFCS III, 26.3 GMFCS II and 21.1% GMFCS I and 84.2% SUS users (Unified Health System). A strong correlation was found between ability and mobility performance at home (R = 0.726; p <0.001), school (R = 0.726; p< 0.001) and community (R = 0.680; p<0.001) environments.

Conclusion

Results of mobility, ability, and performance are strongly correlated in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy aged 4 to 17 years.

Implications

This study demonstrates that children are performing mobility at home, at school, and in the community according to what they are able to accomplish.

Keywords:
Cerebral Palsy
Capacity
Performance
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments: Thanks to the university hospital for providing the infrastructure for the evaluations and the parents who allowed their children to participate in the study.

Ethics committee approval: Research Ethics Committee of the University of Brasília (CAAE: 28540620.6.1001.5133).

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.