Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
320
Full text access
KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS FOR USING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN CLINICAL DECISION MAKING
Visits
147
Maria Luiza Caires Comper1,2,3, Rodrigo Almeida Souza2, Jeniffer de Araújo Abreu Minervino4
1 Techno-Science and Innovation Training Centre, Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil
2 Master's Program in Health, Environment and Biodiversity (UFSB), Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil
3 Master's Program in Physical Education (UESC), Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil
4 Medical student at the Health Sciences Training Center at the Federal University of Southern Bahia (UFSB), Paulo Freire campus, Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is an approach that aims to solve health problems through decision-making based on the best scientific evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical experience. To this end, health professionals must obtain knowledge and skills that allow them to formulate clinical questions, carry out searches in the literature, carefully evaluate the evidence, carry out the transposition of this evidence into the clinical context and verify its effectiveness for solving the initial problem. Despite the relevance of the topic, there are still few studies that assess the level of knowledge and skills of medical students regarding the use of EBM principles for clinical decision-making.

Objectives

To diagnose the level of knowledge and skills of medical students regarding the use of scientific evidence for clinical decision-making, considering the principles of EBM.

Methods

This is an observational, cross-sectional study with a population of medical students. Inclusion criteria were: Brazilian nationality, being over 18 years old, being enrolled from the 3rd year of the course and taking courses listed in the clinical cycle. Sociodemographic questionnaires and questionnaires on the level of prior knowledge in EBM were used, in addition to the Assessing Competencies in Evidence-Based Medicine (ACE) tool. All instruments were transferred and made available through the Google Forms online questionnaire platform. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

The sample consisted of 45 students, mostly men (68.9%), brown (64.4%), single (84.4%) and enrolled in federal universities (91.1%), between the 3rd and 5th year of the course (56.8%). Most claimed to have knowledge (82.2%), regular skills (57.5%) and apply them (82.2%) in clinical practice, however, the average percentage of correct answers in the ACE tool was 43.97 % and about 41.7% left answers blank.

Conclusion

The results of the study demonstrate that, although most medical students claim to have knowledge and skills for the use of scientific evidence in clinical decision-making, there is a disagreement between the way participants perceive their own knowledge and actual knowledge, considering It was found that after applying the measurement instrument, only a reasonable percentage demonstrated adequate mastery of this clinical practice.

Implications

This study reveals important diagnostic points about knowledge and skills of medical students for the use of EBM that can be used to expand the training of health professionals in EBM. Such an approach helps in the formation of physicians with greater capacity for analysis, autonomy and willing to maintain the continuing education process to remain informed about the most current evidence that appears in the field of medicine.

Keywords:
Evidence-Based Medicine
Scientific Evidence
Training in Medicine
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: Not applicable.

Ethics committee approval: Federal University of Southern Bahia - 52726421.0.0000.8467.

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.