Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
206
Full text access
HOW DO THE PHYSIOTHERAPISTS AT A SPECIALIZED REHABILITATION CENTER PERCEIVE THE CARE NETWORK AND THE FAMILY?
Visits
157
José Erivonaldo Ferreira Paiva Júnior1, Gabriel Nóbrega Vieira1, Mayza Leite Felix Maciel1, Natasha Felipe da Silva1, João Victor Matos da Silva1, Robson da Fonseca Neves1
1 Laboratório de Estudos e Práticas em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

The Specialized Rehabilitation Centers (CER) are the points in the network responsible for promoting attention and care for People with Disabilities (PwD), but their work goes beyond this task, being an important place for approaching families of PwD and a privileged locus for articulating the care network. Health care networks (RAS), more specifically, Care Networks for PwD, are one of the ways to promote comprehensive, longitudinal, and continuous care for PwD. In this way, professionals working in the CER, including physiotherapists, must be familiar with the management of articulation with networks. The physiotherapist is an agent within this web of care and the way he perceives the families of PwD and their interactions with the network can be fundamental for the establishment of practices that are expected in terms of the performance of professionals in the CER.

Objective

To find out, through the set of individual experiences of physiotherapists, the senses and meanings attributed to the physiotherapist's relationships with the care network and with families.

Methods

It is a qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory study, theoretically and methodologically supported by the content analysis proposed by Bardin. For this research, participant observation and interviews were adopted as techniques, guided by a previously defined script. The locating context of the research was a CER in the state of Paraíba - PB, where 13 physiotherapists from a Rehabilitation sector were interviewed.

Results

The study reveals that there is still a gap between the care currently provided by CER physiotherapists and the biopsychosocial approach. Physical therapists face difficulties in understanding and performing articulations with the network and centralize this role in the social worker. Regarding the family, they recognize the central role of the mother in care but have difficulty perceiving the burden on her and the need for a better division of care between family members, finally highlighting a utilitarian relationship with the family, required to support therapies, but away from discussions about the care provided to PwD.

Conclusion

Family and Care Network are two fundamental elements for the work in the CER, but they are still opaque in the view of physiotherapists. Because the family is seen, sometimes, only in the figure of the mother and the hammock is an entity still little known by physiotherapists.

Implications

The results of this work can be used in the permanent health education process at the CER to reflect on changes in the work process of physiotherapists with regard to families and to instigate the process of bringing the CER professionals closer to the whole of network, since many of these services already exist in the logic of an independent rehabilitation service, formally disconnected from other services.

Keywords:
Physiotherapy
Disabled People
Integrality in Health
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: To the supervisor who guided this research, to FAPESQ/CNPq for funding scientific research through PPSUS 05/2020, to the LEPASC group and UFPB.

Ethics committee approval: Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Paraiba, CAAE: 37347020.3.0000.5188.

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.