Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
319
Full text access
GAIT TRAINING AND NEUROMODULATION ON EXECUTIVE AND MOTOR FUNCTION IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
Visits
118
Maria Luísa Andrade Gomes1, Mayane Lais Veloso Férrer1, Amanda Carneiro Nascimento1, David Sam Pessoa1, Maria Clara Silva De Melo1, Adriana Carla Costa Ribeiro Clementino1
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Postgraduate Program in Physical Therapy, Laboratory of Neurosciences of the Locomotor System (NeuroMOVE), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Cognitive impartment is recurrent in Parkinson's disease (PD), including deficits in cognitive ability to learn, organize new information, form concepts, and switch focus between tasks (executive functions). These dysfunctions lead to gait alterations, because people with PD tend to prioritize only one activity in dual-task situations. Evidence shows that dual task treadmill training results in improved gait, postural balance, and motor coordination in PD. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a relevant tool in improving cognitive skills by modulating cortical excitability. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the benefits of the association of these techniques when applied simultaneously in PD.

Objectives

The study aimed to analyze the effects of tDCS simultaneous to dual-task treadmill training on motor function, functional mobility, verbal fluency, and processing speed in people with PD.

Methods

The pilot study of a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial including people with PD. People aged 40-70 years, above 24 in the Mini-Mental State Examination, and staging 1.5 to 3 of the modified Hoehn and Yahr scale were included. Eveluated for motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III - MDS-UPDRS, primary endpoint; Timed Up and Go - TUG test; Timed Up and Go dual task - TUG DT); and cognitive function (Stroop Test; Trail Making Test - TMT; Verbal Fluency Test - VF) before and after the 12 intervention sessions over four weeks. All received 2mA excitatory stimulation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 20 minutes and treadmill gait training. The experimental group realized simultaneously a validated protocol for a randomized controlled trial of dual-task training, containing mental sorting, decision-making, and verbal fluency activities. We analyzed the normality of the sample by the Shapiro-Wilk test and the data by the Wilcoxon test, with a significance level of 95%.

Results

Six subjects participated in the study, aged 60 (5.02) years; mixed clinical type (83%); MMSE score of 27.5 (1.71); H&Ymod of 2.08 (0.5); levodopa equivalent dose per day of 765.2 (399.3). They presented in the primary endpoint significant difference in motor function for MDS-UPDRS part III (Z=-2.060; p=0.039), in TUG functional mobility (Z=-1.992; p=0.046) and TUG DT (Z=-1992; p=0.046). As for cognitive function, there was no significant difference for the tests: Stroop (Z=-943; p=0.345); FV (Z=-1.761; p=0.078); and TMT (Z=-0.135; p=0.893).

Conclusion

The results suggest that the association between dual-task training and CBT affected motor function and functional mobility. Processing speed and verbal fluency showed no changes by dual-task training in the study.

Implications

The findings help explore methodologies and introduce new procedures to confirm the effects of the protocol under test.

Keywords:
Parkinson's disease
Neuromodulation
Dual-task
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: To CAPES: work carried out with the support of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) - Funding Code 001.

Ethics committee approval: Ethics committee approval: The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the CCS of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba (CEP-UFPB), through Plataforma Brasil, under the number CAAE 30668420.7.0000.5188

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.