Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
214
Full text access
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF TWO GROUPS OF SUSPENSION TRAINING ON PAIN IN WOMEN WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: A PILOT STUDY
Visits
91
Julia Milena de Melo1, Lauana de Paula1, Francielle Leonel1, Gustavo Raab1, Dariel Nascimento1, Ana Carolina Brandt de Macedo1
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Low back pain is a disabling disease that originates from multifactorial aspects and directly interferes with the daily life of those who suffer from it.

Objectives

To compare the effects of two suspension training programs on pain in women with chronic low back pain.

Methods

Pilot study in which female participants, aged 18-49 years, with chronic low back pain (CLBP) of unspecific origin were selected. As inclusion criteria, participants should be at least moderately active according to the human activity profile (HAP) and have pain >3 according to the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). After the evaluation, the participants were randomized into 3 groups: control group (CG), suspension training group 1 (STG1) and suspension training group 2 (STG2). STG1 performed the training with progression of exercise difficulty, while STG2 performed the program with progression of the number of repetitions every 4 weeks. The training consisted of 24 sessions, twice a week, for 12 weeks. Each session lasted approximately 50 minutes and was divided into 5 minutes of warm-up, 40 minutes of suspension training and 5 minutes of relaxation. Exercises were performed for upper limbs, trunk and lower limbs. The NPRS evaluation was carried out before the start of treatment and after the end of training (12 weeks).

Results

So far, 11 women have participated, 4 in STG1, 4 in STG2 and 3 in CG. The mean age was 31±09 years and the location of the pain was predominantly bilateral. No significant difference was found in the NPRS after training: STG1 (4±3.75 vs 4±1.50), STG2 (4±5.50 vs 4±3.50), CG (3±3.67 vs 3± 3.33) (Wilcoxon test, p>0.05). The intergroup analysis also showed no significant difference (Kruskall Wallis test, p>0.05).

Conclusion

So far, suspension training has not shown significant results in improving low back pain and there is no significant difference between the effects of STG1 and STG2.

Implications

This study allows us to present suggestions for suspension training exercises that can be prescribed to women with chronic low back pain.

Keywords:
Low back pain
Pain measurement
Suspension training
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: Not applicable.

Ethics committee approval: Not reported.

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.