Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
318
Full text access
COMPARISON BETWEEN ASSOCIATED AND NON-ASSOCIATED PROFESSORS IN STRICTO SENSU GRADUATE PROGRAMS IN RELATION TO PSYCHOSOCIAL ASPECTS OF WORK
Visits
142
Maria Isabel Triches1, Renata Gonçalves Mendes1, Lorena Caligiuri Lemes1, Helen Mami Masuda1, Beatriz Medeiros Cardoso1, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato1
1 Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Pression for high production index affects professors, mainly the ones linked to Stricto Sensu Graduate Programs (PP). This scenario may increase the overwork, resulting in long and exhausting working hours. In this way, professors linked to PP can experience high psychosocial risk at work.

Objectives

To compare two groups of professors, according to their involvement in PP, in relation to psychosocial aspects of work: quantitative demands, emotional demands, work-family conflict, stress and burnout. Our hypothesis is that professors associated to PP will present more psychosocial risks.

Methods

Baseline data from the Respira cohort, was used. Professors were invited to participate through advertisements in the media, social networks, and individual emails. Data collection took place from May to December 2022, using an electronic form structured with sociodemographic, occupational and health questions. Psychosocial aspects were assessed using the COPSOQ II-BR instrument. Data were analyzed descriptively, using relative frequencies. The independent variable “being associated in a Stricto Sensu Graduate Program” was dichotomized into associated group (AG) and non-associated group (NAG). The groups were compared using the Chi-square association test.

Results

The study included 954 professors (AG:61.9%; NAG:38.1%) in higher education courses at public institutions with exclusive dedication of 40 hours a week. The mean age was 49 years (±9.7), 51.4% were male. Regarding burnout, 63.5% of the AG and 60.9% of the NAG present psychosocial risk; 15.7% (AG) and 15.4% (NAG) require attention; 20.8% (AG) and 23.7 (NAG) are safe. About stress, 63.6% of the AG and 63.3% of the NAG present psychosocial risk, 16.2% (AG) and 17.1% (NAG) require attention; 20.1% (AG) and 19.6% (NAG) are safe. Regarding work-family conflict, 47.5% of the AG and 43.9% of the NAG present psychosocial risk; 10.3% (AG) and 9.4% (NAG) require attention; 42.2% (AG) and 46.7% (NAG) are safe. About emotional demands, 51.4% of the AG and 50.1% of the NAG present psychosocial risk; 25.5% (AG) and 22.7% (NAG) require attention; 23.1% (AG) and 27.1% (NAG) are safe. Regarding the quantitative demands, 22.2% of the AG and 14.9% of the NAG present psychosocial risk; 18.8% (AG) and 16.5% (NAG) require attention; 59% (AG) and 68.6% (NAG) are safe. Only for quantitative demands, there was a significant association, and the AG had a higher proportion of professors in the risk category.

Conclusion

Associated professors in Stricto Sensu PP showed a higher psychosocial risk in relation to the quantitative demands, demonstrating a greater overload of activities. Despite the other variables not being associated with the groups, it is noted that the professors had high frequencies of psychosocial risk in relation to burnout, stress, work-family conflict, and emotional demands of work.

Implications

These results highlight the psychosocial risks reported by professors and can support the institutions to formulate policies to reduce these risks and promote heath actions for this working population.

Keywords:
Faculty
Psychosocial Impact
Occupational Health
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: This research was funded by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Ethics committee approval: Research Ethics Committee of UFSCar (CAAE:56582322.7.0000.5504).

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.