Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
294
Full text access
CARDIORESPIRATORY RESPONSE IN POST-COVID VOLUNTEERS ACCORDING TO THE VENTILATORY SUPPORT RECEIVED IN THE ACUTE PHASE: CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Visits
153
Marcela Lopes Alves1, Robson Fernando Borges2, Jean Carlos Coutinho3, Vinícius Zacarias Maldaner da Silva3, Graziella Cipriano1,2, Gerson Cipriano Junior1,2,3
1 Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil
2 Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technology, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil
3 Postgraduate Program in Human Movement and Rehabilitation, Universidade Evangélica de Goiás (UniEVANGÉLICA), Anápolis, Goiás
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

The assessment of functional capacity in volunteers with post-covid syndrome has become an important issue to estimate functional consequences, disability and physiological responses to exercise. Our hypothesis is that patients show different cardiorespiratory responses to the 1-minute sit and stand test (1STS) according to the ventilatory support received in the acute phase of the disease.

Objectives

To compare the initial cardiorespiratory responses by 1STS of patients from the "Post-covid life" study according to the ventilatory support received in the acute phase of the disease.

Methods

Cross-sectional observational study with post-covid volunteers with different severities of both sexes, adults, recruited between June 2020 to October 2022 to a Physiology Laboratory of UnB. For comparison the volunteers were divided into 3 groups according to the respiratory support received in the acute phase, being: no respiratory support (SSR), oxygen therapy (O2) and mechanical ventilation (MV). They were evaluated by 1STS according to the pre-established protocol, including recording heart rate, perception of effort before and after the test and number of repetitions performed. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package For The Social Sciences (SPSS), version 20. The Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normality of the variables. The ANOVA test for unrepeated measures and the Kruskal Wallis test were used for intergroup comparisons, considering p<0.05 statistically significant. Registration number: NCT04595097.

Results

We included 75 participants, 56% female, mean age 53.3±11.6 years, BMI 31.2±6.1 kg/m², hospitalization 20.1±17.8 days, 74% sedentary and 18% previously active. The number of repetitions was 21.3±9.4, 19.5±5.9 and 21.6±7.4 for SSR, O2 and MV groups respectively. The volunteers had a mean HR pre of 79.5± 11.0, 83.3± 12.6 and post of 85.6± 14.6, 92.2± 16.0, 101.3± 16.4 and 105.2± 18.7 beats for the SSR, O2 and MV groups. The pre-BORG of the SSR, O2, and MV groups were 9.1± 2.8, 9.7± 2.8, and 8.3± 8.0, and post 12.1± 3.3, 14.2± 2.6, and 13.0± 2.7. Although the number of repetitions showed no difference between groups (p>0.05), HR and BORG were higher in the MV group compared to the others (p<0.005).

Conclusion

Although the number of repetitions obtained by 1STS did not vary according to the ventilatory support received in the acute phase of COVID 19, the cardiorespiratory adjustments were greater in the volunteers submitted to MV compared to those who used O2 and SSR, suggesting greater deconditioning.

Implications

The results suggest that 1STS with HR monitoring and BORG is a functional test capable of assessing cardiorespiratory adjustments in post-covid patients.

Keywords:
Physical exercise
COVID-19
Rehabilitation
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: This research was developed with the financial support of CNPq, CAPES and FAPDF.

Ethics committee approval: The present study was approved by the ethics in research council of the institution Universidade de Brasília Faculdade de Ceilândia and is registered under number CAAE: 35706720.4.0000.8093.

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.