Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
83
Full text access
BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO ACCESS TO REHABILITATION SERVICES IN BRAZIL FOR POST-STROKE INDIVIDUALS IN THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF RECOVERY
Visits
164
Carolina Luisa de Almeida Soares1, Jordana de Paula Magalhães1, Iza Faria-Fortini2, Ludmilla Ribeiro Batista2, Lidiane Andrea Oliveira Lima3, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria1
1 Department of Physiotherapy. Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
2 Department of Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
3 Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Post-stroke individuals should have immediate and full access to rehabilitation services after hospital discharge. This access must be obtained in the first six months of the event, a period where the chances of recovery are greater. Thus, it becomes relevant to know the barriers and facilitators of this access. However, studies on this topic were not found in developing countries such as Brazil.

Objectives

To identify barriers and facilitators to access to rehabilitation services for post-stroke individuals discharged from a stroke unit of a public hospital in Brazil in the first six months of recovery.

Methods

A cross-sectional and descriptive study was developed. Sociodemographic and clinical-functional data were collected in the hospital during the acute phase. Six months after discharge, data on barriers and facilitators to access to rehabilitation services were collected, considering 20 aspects related to the economic conditions and displacement to rehabilitation services, quality, and organization of rehabilitation services, as well as individual's personal conditions.

Results

174 individuals (62±21 years old) were included. Among the 20 aspects analyzed, 17 (85%) were most frequently pointed out as facilitators. The main facilitators pointed out was the patient's expectation of the treatment and the quality of care offered, identified by the vast majority (>79%) of the individuals. In addition, all aspects related to the quality of rehabilitation services were pointed out as facilitators by the majority of the subjects. Three (15%) aspects were most frequently pointed out as barriers: income available for health care (49.4%), waiting time to make an appointment and be attended (47.2%), and scheduling process (45.4%).

Conclusion

More facilitators than barriers were pointed out. That is, in the first six months of recovery, aspects related to economic conditions and displacement to rehabilitation services, organization of rehabilitation services, quality of rehabilitation services and personal conditions of the individual, have, for the most part, positively influenced the access to rehabilitation services for post-stroke individuals.

Implications

Considering the identified barriers, public policies to subsidize health costs and optimize the waiting time and scheduling process in rehabilitation services should be considered relevant tools to facilitate access to rehabilitation services for post-stroke individuals. Likewise, human, and financial resources must be directed towards promoting the enabling factors.

Keywords:
Stroke
Access to rehabilitation services
Barriers and facilitators
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: We appreciate the funding agencies: CAPES, CNPq, FAPEMIG, and PRPq/UFMG. We also appreciated the collaboration of the professionals from Hospital Risoleta Tolentino Neves.

Ethics committee approval: Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (CAAE:26431319.6.0000.5149).

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.