Journal Information
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 28. Issue S1.
1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)
(01 April 2024)
184
Full text access
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN POSTURAL BALANCE AND FUNCTIONAL STATUS IN POST COVID-19 CONDITION IN NON-HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS
Visits
133
Janice Regina Moreira Bastos1, Izabella Bárbara de Araújo Paz Melo1, Fabio Vieira dos Anjos1
1 Laboratory of Neurosciences in Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Sciences Post-Graduation Program, Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
This item has received
Article information
Special issue
This article is part of special issue:
Vol. 28. Issue S1

1st STUDENT SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH AND POSTGRADUATE IN PHYSIOTHERAPY (ABRAPG-FT)

More info
Background

Individuals with post COVID-19 conditions risk to develop short and/or mid term neuromuscular sequels that may involve changes on balance control. The POST-COVID-19 Functional Scale (PCFS) has the potential to evaluate the general functional capacity, however, if the PCFS can also be used to measure the impact on the balance control over the post COVID-19 functionality, remains unclear.

Objectives

To investigate if COVID-19 may impact the balance control and if possible, changes are associated with the functional status of the individual estimated by PCFS.

Methods

60 adults were spited into two groups: 30 patients on control group and 30 on post COVID-19 group. Both groups underwent clinical evaluation of balance control based on the following tests: Functional Reach Test (FRT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Time Up and Go (TUG), Tinetti Balance Test (TINETTI) and Mini-BESTest (MBT). Besides, the post COVID group answered the PCFS questionnaire. For data statistical analysis, it was used the Student's T Test, comparing the score found on groups’ balance tests. The Pearson's correlation test was used to correlate the balance tests and PCFS. The multiple linear regression was used to identify which balance variable may play important role on PCFS’ prevision, with significancy level of 5%.

Results

It wasn't found significative differences (p>0,05) between groups for: BBS (average ± control standard deviation and post COVID-19: 49.200±7.863 and 49.300±8.322 points); TUG (12.500±4.925 and 11.033±5.109 seconds); TINETTI (24.467±4.890 and 25.633±3.873 points); and MBT (22.500±5.361 and 22.967±4.716 points). But, for FRT, there was significative difference (p=0,046) between groups post COVID-19 (31,333±6,563 cm) and control (28,083±5,748 cm). The balance variables showed significative correlation (p<0,05) and moderated with PCFS: TINETTI (r=0.584), FRT (r=±-0.542), MBT (r=-0.53), BBS (r=0.415) and TUG (r=0.368). TINETTI was the independent variable that significantly played important role on PCFS’ determination (R² value was set from 0,368, p = 0.004).

Conclusion

The results showed that significative changes on postural stability wasn't observed among groups for most balance tests applied, except FRT. Both groups, however, presented reach on FRT above reference value, indicating low fragility and fall risk for the patients. Minor changes on functional status of post COVID-19 group (23 of 30 patients presented grade between 0 and 1) may explain similarities on body balance among groups. Moderated correlations were observed between PCFS and balance tests and, the TINETTI, seems to play important role on PCFS’ determination.

Implications

In rehabilitation field, the research results indicate the PCFS’ implementation to monitor functionality, covering changes on postural balance and other functional outcomes, aiming to improve evaluation methods and intervention on neuromuscular function rehabilitation on the context of post COVID-19.

Keywords:
Postural balance
COVID-19
post COVID-19 condition
POST-COVID-19 Functional Scale
Full text is only aviable in PDF

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment: The authors wish to thank FAPERJ (grant number E-26/211.104/2021) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Finance Code 001, number 888817.708718/2022-00), Brasil

Ethics committee approval: Augusto Motta University Centre (UNISUAM), CAAE – 54483421.8.0000.5235

Idiomas
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Article options
Tools
en pt
Cookies policy Política de cookies
To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here. Utilizamos cookies próprios e de terceiros para melhorar nossos serviços e mostrar publicidade relacionada às suas preferências, analisando seus hábitos de navegação. Se continuar a navegar, consideramos que aceita o seu uso. Você pode alterar a configuração ou obter mais informações aqui.