5
How important are back pain beliefs and expectations for satisfactory recovery from back pain?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2009.12.012Get rights and content

In this article, we provide an evidence-based review of pain beliefs and their influence on pain perception and response to treatment. We examine the nature of pain perception and the role of cognitive and emotional processes in the interpretation of pain signals, giving meaning to pain and shaping our response to it. We highlight three types of beliefs that have a particularly strong influence: fear-avoidance beliefs, pain self-efficacy beliefs and catastrophising. We examine the influence of beliefs, preferences and expectations on seeking consultation, interventions and treatment outcome from the perspective both of the patient and the health-care practitioner. We then adopt a broader societal perspective, considering secondary prevention and campaigns, which have attempted to change beliefs at a population level. The article concludes with a summary of the key messages for clinical management of patients presenting with painful conditions and suggestions for further research.

Section snippets

The nature of pain perception

Recent advances in neuro-imaging are leading to the identification of pain pathways and parts of the brain associated with the shaping of pain perception. For example, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has led to new understandings about how a painful stimulus is translated into pain perception in the brain. These new understandings have begun to clarify the cascade of events that follows the arrival of a ‘pain signal’, after which different parts of the brain become activated. It

Types of beliefs

DeGood and Tait identify four principal dimensions of belief (regarding aetiology, diagnostics, treatment expectations and outcome goals) [24]. For purposes of clinical management, the most influential types of belief appear to be beliefs about the nature of pain, specific fears of hurting, harming and further injury and self-efficacy beliefs. Other sorts of beliefs influencing consulting and participation in treatment are reviewed in the next section.

Beliefs about the nature of pain

Pain researchers have identified a number

The decision to consult

Patients' attitudes, perceptions and beliefs about their back pain, its likely course and the usefulness of specific treatments may influence an individual's decision to seek health care and to embark on complete treatment, although the evidence to support this is limited by the challenges of data collection from those who do not seek health care. There is evidence from community surveys that about half of those who experience low back pain in a 1-year period will consult an HCP, and that while

The nature of health-care practitioners' beliefs and treatment orientations

Recently, more attention has been drawn to the role of HCP's beliefs, preferences and expectations since they are likely to be an integral part of the health-care process, helping to determine success or failure of treatment. The characteristics of the HCP, such as their status as professionals, their therapeutic style, the words they use with patients, their beliefs about the problem and their confidence or conviction in treatments, have all been suggested as non-specific effects of treatment

Explaining the difference between acute and chronic/recurrent pain studies of population beliefs

While prior back trouble is a strong predictor of future recurrence [78], recovery from a prior episode of back pain results in a better set of beliefs about its consequences. Individuals who have recovered from an episode of back pain in the past have better beliefs about the consequences of back pain than individuals who have never experienced back pain as well as those with current or more recent back pain [79]. This has led to the proposal that those who have survived previous episodes of

Conclusions

Patient beliefs are a core part of pain perception and response to pain. The role of central processes in pain perception, illuminated by advances in technology offer the possibility not only of new understandings on the nature of pain itself but also of new intervention approaches targeting patients' beliefs and expectations, enhancing pain control and improving psychological adjustment. We need to tackle the problem of pain not only at the level of the individual but at a professional and

References (95)

  • J.W. Vlaeyen et al.

    Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art

    Pain

    (2000)
  • S. Morley et al.

    Possible selves in chronic pain: self-pain enmeshment, adjustment and acceptance

    Pain

    (2005)
  • J.H. van den Hout et al.

    The effects of failure feedback and pain-related fear on pain report, pain tolerance, and pain avoidance in chronic low back pain patients

    Pain

    (2001)
  • J.M. Sieben et al.

    Pain-related fear at the start of a new low back pain episode

    Eur J Pain

    (2005)
  • A. Asghari et al.

    Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behaviour. A prospective study

    Pain

    (2001)
  • M.K. Nicholas

    The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account

    Eur J Pain

    (2007)
  • S. Poiraudeau et al.

    Fear-avoidance beliefs about back pain in patients with subacute low back pain

    Pain

    (2006)
  • D. Finniss et al.

    Mechanisms of the placebo response and their impact on clinical trials and clinical practice

    Pain

    (2005)
  • P. Goffaux et al.

    Descending analgesia–when the spine echoes what the brain expects

    Pain

    (2007)
  • M. Price et al.

    Greater expectations: using hierarchical linear modelling to examine expectancy for treatment outcome as a predictor of treatment response

    Behavior Ther

    (2008)
  • K. Linde et al.

    The impact of patient expectations on outcomes in four randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in patients with chronic pain

    Pain

    (2007)
  • N.E. Foster et al.

    Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: what are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome?

    Pain

    (2008)
  • A. Feinstein

    Post-therapeutic response and therapeutic style: re-formulating the placebo effect

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (2002)
  • E. Coudeyre et al.

    General practitioners' fear-avoidance beliefs influence their management of patients with low back pain

    Pain

    (2006)
  • T. Pincus et al.

    Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: a comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp

    Man Ther

    (2007)
  • R.W. Ostelo et al.

    Health care provider's attitudes and beliefs towards chronic low back pain: the development of a questionnaire

    Man Ther

    (2003)
  • A. Bishop et al.

    How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? a survey of UK general practitioners and physiotherapists

    Pain

    (2008)
  • R.M.A. Houben et al.

    Do health care providers' attitudes towards back pain predict their treatment recommendations? differential predictive validity of implicit and explicit attitude measures

    Pain

    (2005)
  • R.M.A. Houben et al.

    Health care providers' orientations towards common low back pain predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations regarding return to normal activity

    Eur J Pain

    (2005)
  • M.J. Stewart et al.

    Patient and clinician treatment preferences do not moderate the effect of exercise treatment in chronic whiplash-associated disorders

    Eur JPain

    (2008)
  • P. Jellema et al.

    Why is a treatment aimed at psychosocial factors not effective in patients with (sub)acute low back pain?

    Pain

    (2005)
  • J.M. Sieben et al.

    General practitioners' treatment orientations towards low back pain: influence on treatment behaviour and patient outcome

    Eur J Pain

    (2009)
  • A. Bishop et al.

    Health care practitioners' attitudes and beliefs about low back pain: a systematic search and critical review of available measurement tools

    Pain

    (2007)
  • E.L. Werner et al.

    Low back pain media campaign: no effect on sickness behaviour

    Pat Ed Counsel

    (2008)
  • B. Walker et al.

    Low back pain in Australian adults. Health provider utilization and care seeking

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther

    (2004)
  • S.R. Woby et al.

    Self-efficacy mediates the relation between pain-related fear and outcome in chronic low back pain patients

    Eur J Pain

    (2007)
  • M.P. Woods et al.

    Evaluating the efficacy of graded in vivo exposure for the treatment of fear in patients with chronic back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial

    Pain

    (2008)
  • R. Thomson et al.

    Engaging patients in decisions: a challenge to health care delivery and public health

    Qual Health Care

    (2001)
  • Department of Health

    Building on the best: choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS

    (2003)
  • M. Jenson

    Hypnosis for chronic pain management: a new hope

    Pain

    (2009)
  • K. Weich et al.

    Review: neurocognitive aspects of pain perception

    Trends Cogn Neurosci

    (2008)
  • H. Flor et al.

    Biopsychosocial models of pain

  • N. Kendall et al.

    Tackling musculoskeletal problems, a guide for the clinic and workplace: identifying obstacles using the psychosocial flags framework

    (2009)
  • Nicholas M, Linton S, Watson P, Linton S. Yellow flags: the identification and management of psychosocial risk factors...
  • C. Main et al.

    Pain management in clinical and occupational settings

    (2008)
  • J. Vlaeyen et al.

    The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability

    J Occup Rehabil

    (1995)
  • D. Turk et al.

    Pain and behavioral medicine. A cognitive beavioral perspective

    (1983)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Tel.: +44 1782 734705; Fax: +44 01782 733911.

    2

    Tel.: +613 9508 1652; Fax: +613 9508 1653.

    View full text