Elsevier

Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Volume 61, Issue 2, September–October 2015, Pages 301-306
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Pilot study on the Chinese version of the Life Space Assessment among community-dwelling elderly

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.06.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The Chinese version of LSA (LSA-C) has acceptable reliability and validity.

  • The LSA-C is a sensitive tool for measuring mobility.

  • The LSA-C is suitable for research on our aging society.

Abstract

Purpose

To translate the Life Space Assessment (LSA) into Chinese and to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LSA (LSA-C) among community-dwelling elderly.

Materials and methods

Data were collected from 100 community-dwelling elderly people (50 males and 50 females) aged over 65 years (72.23 ± 5.05) in Shanghai. The criterion convergent validity was evaluated by bivariate Pearson correlation analysis separately between the LSA-C and physical health section of the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36-PH), Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADLs), and Mini Physical Performance Test (Mini-PPT). The construct validity was estimated using mental health section of the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36-MH), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The test–retest reliability of the LSA-C was tested after two weeks by inter-class correlation method.

Results

The test–retest reliability of the LSA-C was 0.76. The criterion convergent validity, which was evaluated by bivariate Pearson correlation analysis between the LSA-C and SF-36-PH, IADLs, and Mini-PPT, was 0.595 (P < 0.001), 0.567 (P < 0.001), and 0.433 (P < 0.001), respectively. The construct validity, which was evaluated by the SF-36, GDS, and MMSE, was 0.704 (P < 0.001), −0.544 (P < 0.001), and 0.424 (P < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

The LSA-C has acceptable reliability and validity and is significantly correlated with other health evaluation tools with respect to, e.g., health status, daily function, physical performance, presence of depression, and cognitive status. These results demonstrate that the LSA-C can be applied to health evaluations and interventions in community-dwelling elderly in China.

Introduction

Mobility is defined as the ability to move around effectively for specific purposes. Mobility restrictions pose threats to autonomy and life quality, especially to elderly people (O’Connor, Edwards, Wadley, & Crowe, 2010; Parker, Baker, & Allman, 2011; Stalvey, Owsley, Sloane, & Ball, 1999). Life space is an index that reflects a person’s mobility (O’Connor et al., 2010, Parker et al., 2011; Peel, Baker, & Roth, 2005; Stalvey et al., 1999). This concept was derived from two theories, namely “Person-in-environment” theory and ecology models (Parker et al., 2011). Consequently, life space emphasizes the interaction between the individual and the environment (Parker et al., 2011). Compared with the previous evaluation concepts and tools, life space encompasses more factors in real life, such as demographic data, general health, physical activity ability, psychological and cognitive conditions, and social involvement (Allman, Baker, Maisiak, Sims, & Roseman, 2004; Boyle, Buchman, Barnes, James, & Bennett, 2010; James, Boyle, Buchman, Barnes, & Bennett, 2011; Murata, Kondo, Tamakoshi, Yatsuya, & Toyoshima, 2006).

Life space evaluation tools have been developed in various studies. The Life Space Diary (LSD), established by May, Nayak, and Isaacs (1985), was the first life space evaluation tool. Respondents were asked to record their actual life space in a diary format, including information such as the weather, incidence of falls, and whether the individual had been in five concentric areas (bedroom, house, garden and area around dwelling, residential block, and the area across a traffic artery). A month later, scores were calculated using a formula. Additionally, respondents were asked to assess gait and balance ability. The LSD scores were positively correlated with walking speed and negatively correlated with average swinging stride (May et al., 1985). In 1990, Tinetti and Ginter (1990) established another tool, the Nursing Home Life Space Diameter (NHLSD), based on the LSD. The NHLSD was developed to assess the extent and frequency of mobility in skilled nursing facility residents. In 1999, Stalvey et al. (1999) developed the Life Space Questionnaire (LSQ). The LSQ contains more accurate space levels than the LSD and NHLSD. The investigation time span is three days, which is much shorter than that of previous tools. In 2003, Baker, Bodner, and Allman (2003) developed a new life space evaluation tool, namely, the Life Space Assessment (LSA). Different from previous tools assessing life space, LSA takes frequency and independence into account, in addition to life space sphere. Put it another way, LSA do not take a one-sided approach to evaluate life space level. As a result, LSA can reflects elders’ actual situation. In their study (Baker et al., 2003), the LSA showed good reliability and validity.

Currently, the LSA has been translated into several languages, including Japanese (Murata et al., 2006), French-Canadian (Auger et al., 2009), Finnish (Rantanen et al., 2012), Spanish (Curcio et al., 2013), and Swedish (Kammerlind, Fristedt, Ernsth Bravell, & Fransson, 2014). Translation to native languages and cross-cultural adaptations are critical for a new instrument if used in another country with another language (Beaton, Bombardier, Guillemin, & Ferraz, 2000). However, life space and LSA have never been introduced in mainland China. To test the applicability of the instrument in Chinese elderly and to introduce a new method to measure elderly people’s health status and quality of life, we conducted a pilot study with the Chinese version of the Life Space Assessment (LSA-C) among community-dwelling elderly people.

Section snippets

Design and sample

This study was conducted in Pudong New Area of Shanghai, which had a total of 5.154 million inhabitants in 2012 (“Analysis of Pudong New Area demographic data”, 2012). The sample pool consisted of elderly health records from 44 community health service centers in Pudong. Samples were randomly selected in stage sampling way from health records that were collected by community health centers in compliance with government policy. People with paralysis or dementia and those living in nursing homes

Results

The study included 100 elderly people (50 males and 50 females) who were aged 65 years and older in the end. There were 32 (24.24%) people refused to participate in this study. The average age of all the participants was 72.23 years (±5.05). The composite life space (LS-C) score of the elderly in this study was 71.87 (±20.24) (95%CI:67.85–75.88) (Table 1). Score of LS-C after two weeks was 71.16 (±22.31) and the test–retest reliability of the Chinese version of the LSA-C was 0.76 (P = 0.000).

The

Discussion

The worldwide population is aging at an unprecedented rate. This growth negatively affects development and places substantial demand on elderly support, medical expenses, and social services. This situation is more serious in developing countries than in developed countries because developing countries simultaneously face both development and aging threats. To address this dilemma, “Active Aging” was developed by the Second World Assembly on Aging in 2002 (The United Nations, 2002). This

Conclusions

This study is the first to introduce the LSA to mainland China. This study demonstrated that the LSA is a sensitive tool for measuring mobility among the Chinese community-dwelling elderly. The LSA-C has acceptable reliability and validity and is significantly correlated with other health evaluation tools with respect to, e.g., health status, daily function, physical performance, presence of depression and cognitive status. Consequently, the Chinese version is suitable for research on our aging

Limitations

This was a pilot study conducted among community-dwelling elders and the objective of this study was only to test the reliability and validity of the LSA-C rather than investigating the overall situation about life space mobility of community-dwelling elderly. The limited sample size may (1) restrict the exploration of the association between the LSA-C and other parameters and (2) not reflect the overall situation regarding life space mobility among older adults. As a result, research with a

Conflict of interest

We confirm that there are no real or potential conflict of interests associated with this research and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcomes.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by all the community health centers in Pudong New Area of Shanghai.

References (49)

  • P.S. Baker et al.

    Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (2003)
  • R. Basil et al.

    The mini mental state examination

    Practical Neurology

    (2005)
  • D.E. Beaton et al.

    Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures

    Spine

    (2000)
  • P.A. Boyle et al.

    Association between life space and risk of mortality in advanced age

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (2010)
  • T.L. Brink et al.

    Screening tests for geriatric depression

    Clinical Gerontology

    (1982)
  • D.W. Chen et al.

    Pilot study on mini-physical performance test for Chinese elder

    Chinese Journal of Health Care Medicine

    (2011)
  • Classification of Municipalities. (1979). Available from...
  • M. Crowe et al.

    Life-space and cognitive decline in a community-based sample of African American and Caucasian older adults

    Journal of Gerontology Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

    (2008)
  • C.L. Curcio et al.

    Life-Space Assessment scale to assess mobility: Validation in Latin American older women and men

    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

    (2013)
  • X.Y. He et al.

    Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of geriatric depression scale among Chinese rural community-dwelling elderly population

    Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (2008)
  • V. Henderson et al.

    Principles and practice of nursing sixth edition

    (1978)
  • E. John et al.

    The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection

    Medical Care

    (1992)
  • C.M.-C. José et al.

    Prevalence of functional disability in activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and associated factors, as predictors of morbidity and mortality

    Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

    (2010)
  • A.S. Kammerlind et al.

    Test–retest reliability of the Swedish version of the Life-Space Assessment Questionnaire among community-dwelling older adults

    Clinical Rehabilitation

    (2014)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Dose-Response Relationship Between Life-Space Mobility and Mortality in Older Japanese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study

      2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      We found similar results using data from 10,014 participants, a sample more than 2.5 times the size of previous studies. Considering some previous studies,4,7–9,11 LSM may have significant associations not only with physical performance but also with social relationships and behaviors.9 Two popular theoretical models suggest the potential effects of social relationships on health outcomes, including mortality risk.32

    • Validation of the Chinese version of the Life-Space Assessment in community-dwelling older adults

      2020, Geriatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      The LSA is sensitive to assess changes to mobility over time in older adults with different disease conditions and environmental features.2,14,17,18 The LSA has been translated into multiple languages, including French,19 Spanish,20 Korean,21 and Japanese,22 but just one study with a small sample size and limited generalizability has been done of an LSA for use with older adults in a Chinese context.23 Thus, we have conducted this study to generate the Chinese version of the Life-Space Assessment (LSA-C).

    • Frailty and its association with the Mediterranean diet, life-space, and social participation in community-dwelling older people

      2019, Geriatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      A higher MDS indicates closer adherence to the Mediterranean diet.32 Life-space was measured as an independent variable using the Life-Space Assessment (LSA).34 LSA measures life-space at five specific levels by proximity from level 1 (inside the home) to level 5 (outside a district).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text